Unregulated free wealth is not often charitable wealth, especially in business. investors expect return on their investments, which destroys the usefulness of the science in most cases, and which stagnates business and science progress in an anticompetetive place without the option of public review.
the better answer for investment is broadly spread wealth, with numerous beneficiaries contributing to scientific progress and programs. This way the wealth and return of a program is more widely distributed and jointly owned or supported. This can easily shift it to the public sector where it can be best used and developed, like freeware, or maintained by a public ordinance, like power and road companies, which should functionally be not-for-profit state organizations.
Wednesday, August 09, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment