"Political Opinions: How did that relate to Ron Paul?
AB SMITH: With him, I could send millions to his pocket, and if he intended to vote against my wishes, that money wouldn’t matter… he would still vote against my wishes. He’s a big problem if he ever made it into office.. thank God it looks like he won’t… not because I don’t like the man as an American.. it’s just that he would make my job hard."
This is what i proposed, and propose now for every politician, to beat corruption. Hard.
Ron Paul is the man, and this is one more reason that he will be our president.
Saturday, November 10, 2007
Taxes and Ron Paul
Federal Income Taxes are Illegal, according to our Constitution. A fiscal democracy is not present in America. The military should be there next to the Salvation Army with the red pot.
Instead of paying your income taxes to the US government, you may want to spend them on electing Ron Paul for president in 2008. Since individuals from Shreveport, Louisianna, and 150+ charges in Nevada for Federal Income Tax Evasion were dropped without payment, you will probably not be arrested or charged for income tax evasion unless you have very high income, such as beyond normal means, or if you own a successful business. If you don't, you might want to disregard hedging your investment, and donate some 15%, 28%, or 39% of your income that would be wasted on income taxes to Ron Paul.
When elected, Ron Paul would eliminate the IRS. Your illegitimate tax obligations would be removed from you anyway, and currently they have been found to be unconstitutional in trials. Numerous ex-IRS agents have quit paying taxes because they cannot find the law that mandates it. Join them, and join Ron Paul.
Instead of paying your income taxes to the US government, you may want to spend them on electing Ron Paul for president in 2008. Since individuals from Shreveport, Louisianna, and 150+ charges in Nevada for Federal Income Tax Evasion were dropped without payment, you will probably not be arrested or charged for income tax evasion unless you have very high income, such as beyond normal means, or if you own a successful business. If you don't, you might want to disregard hedging your investment, and donate some 15%, 28%, or 39% of your income that would be wasted on income taxes to Ron Paul.
When elected, Ron Paul would eliminate the IRS. Your illegitimate tax obligations would be removed from you anyway, and currently they have been found to be unconstitutional in trials. Numerous ex-IRS agents have quit paying taxes because they cannot find the law that mandates it. Join them, and join Ron Paul.
Thursday, November 08, 2007
Russia and America, Oil and Dollar
Russia and America, Oil and Dollar
Co-Posted in www.tacticaledge.blogspot.com
I am seeing some possibilities. They are nothing more than possibilities at this point. Although they have been speculated upon to modest degrees they are injustice.
America took Iraq. They took Afghanistan. Now America has been planning to invade Iran. While internationally weighing the wargames of this scenario and the industrial peak oil consequences of such a disaster, Russia announced that an invasion of Iran would be seen as an invasion of Russia. This has stalled American efforts at an Iranian invasion and complicated an American/Israeli/Saudi oil monopoly.
Americans may have been counting on using this potential monopoly or political capital from terrorism and war to leverage key military, financial, and industrial circumstances in future engagements which will not either not happen or happen much later, or a slight chance of soon but more dreadfully. It is more probable now that Russia and China will come into swing on the middle eastern and Indian/Pakistani topics and into the world economic and industrial and resource oriented scene.
Similarly, all three major players and Europe will be experiencing a massive cultural and political revolution regarding libertarianism as China falls to a social revolution sometime in 2008 or 2009, and Russian president Vladimir Putin faces a Russian Constitutional crisis in 2008, and America experiences the Ron Paul revolution into 2008 and other media projects, and Europe works with Islamists and sustainability through the decade.
Financial crises seem inevitable. The American dollar will crumble and collapse as it has been abused **in preparation for the Amero to replace it**. Get on the stick, CIA.
This should roughly coincide with a world oil crisis as peak oil comes to pass. New Brazilian crude could lighten the disaster, but will not nearly prevent it. Ron Paul and Alaskan and other energy infusions will come too late, but aid after the disaster hits, pinpointed perhaps 4-10 months from now, in time for the 2008 elections.
Russia has allegedly been working politically in the Middle Eastern regions to strengthen their position in respect to a potential Iranian invasion, particularly in Georgia and Jordan. China appears to be enhancing their hegemonic tendencies while softening to a revolution that could engulf the region.
China has collected even more dollar notes, rising the total to $1.45 trillion, up from 1.3 trillion shortly beforehand, and that up from 900 billion seemingly 6 months ago. The USD has fallen against the CAN and world currencies and oil and gold, and London revised upwards their futures estimates for gold for 2008 and 2009.
An oil shortage would be disastrous for humanity. Some 60% of our oil is used for agriculture, and our food reserves have dropped what appears to be 6 out of the past 7 years since 1999. Oil supply is tighter than any time other than 1980 and 1973, and oil prices have reached record highs at some $97 a barrel, up from $20 a barrel back when we had a meaningful food surplus. This price may be artificially inflated due to dollar weakness.
A war in Iran would be disastrous for humanity. It would precipitate an immediate oil shortfall of millions of daily barrels and war between America and Israel, and Iran and Russia, with China ringside leaning communist.
What is Japan doing in the meantime?
Goals:
Leave Iraq
Impeach Dick Cheney and George Bush
Reopen 9/11 Commission in light of NIST and other evidence
Investigate the 1000 most powerful humans and their conspiracies
Ban AIPAC from America
Secure non-oil energy supplies and farming
Elect Ron Paul president
Expose corporate media
Train Americans in non-violent revolution and civil action
Other secondary goals.
Co-Posted in www.tacticaledge.blogspot.com
I am seeing some possibilities. They are nothing more than possibilities at this point. Although they have been speculated upon to modest degrees they are injustice.
America took Iraq. They took Afghanistan. Now America has been planning to invade Iran. While internationally weighing the wargames of this scenario and the industrial peak oil consequences of such a disaster, Russia announced that an invasion of Iran would be seen as an invasion of Russia. This has stalled American efforts at an Iranian invasion and complicated an American/Israeli/Saudi oil monopoly.
Americans may have been counting on using this potential monopoly or political capital from terrorism and war to leverage key military, financial, and industrial circumstances in future engagements which will not either not happen or happen much later, or a slight chance of soon but more dreadfully. It is more probable now that Russia and China will come into swing on the middle eastern and Indian/Pakistani topics and into the world economic and industrial and resource oriented scene.
Similarly, all three major players and Europe will be experiencing a massive cultural and political revolution regarding libertarianism as China falls to a social revolution sometime in 2008 or 2009, and Russian president Vladimir Putin faces a Russian Constitutional crisis in 2008, and America experiences the Ron Paul revolution into 2008 and other media projects, and Europe works with Islamists and sustainability through the decade.
Financial crises seem inevitable. The American dollar will crumble and collapse as it has been abused **in preparation for the Amero to replace it**. Get on the stick, CIA.
This should roughly coincide with a world oil crisis as peak oil comes to pass. New Brazilian crude could lighten the disaster, but will not nearly prevent it. Ron Paul and Alaskan and other energy infusions will come too late, but aid after the disaster hits, pinpointed perhaps 4-10 months from now, in time for the 2008 elections.
Russia has allegedly been working politically in the Middle Eastern regions to strengthen their position in respect to a potential Iranian invasion, particularly in Georgia and Jordan. China appears to be enhancing their hegemonic tendencies while softening to a revolution that could engulf the region.
China has collected even more dollar notes, rising the total to $1.45 trillion, up from 1.3 trillion shortly beforehand, and that up from 900 billion seemingly 6 months ago. The USD has fallen against the CAN and world currencies and oil and gold, and London revised upwards their futures estimates for gold for 2008 and 2009.
An oil shortage would be disastrous for humanity. Some 60% of our oil is used for agriculture, and our food reserves have dropped what appears to be 6 out of the past 7 years since 1999. Oil supply is tighter than any time other than 1980 and 1973, and oil prices have reached record highs at some $97 a barrel, up from $20 a barrel back when we had a meaningful food surplus. This price may be artificially inflated due to dollar weakness.
A war in Iran would be disastrous for humanity. It would precipitate an immediate oil shortfall of millions of daily barrels and war between America and Israel, and Iran and Russia, with China ringside leaning communist.
What is Japan doing in the meantime?
Goals:
Leave Iraq
Impeach Dick Cheney and George Bush
Reopen 9/11 Commission in light of NIST and other evidence
Investigate the 1000 most powerful humans and their conspiracies
Ban AIPAC from America
Secure non-oil energy supplies and farming
Elect Ron Paul president
Expose corporate media
Train Americans in non-violent revolution and civil action
Other secondary goals.
Sunday, November 04, 2007
World Resources
China could consume like Americans, although the world doesn't have the resources to do it, if they use alchemy and efficient scientific systems. So could other 3rd world countries.
Friday, November 02, 2007
Markets Unresponsive/ble
Note that having recommended gold to my financial patients, the London Exchange upgraded their expectations for gold values in 2008 and 2009 by a over 10%. Patients who switched made tidy profits.
Why are markets not responding to the rise in the price of oil? Despite $93/barrel oil, risky supply chains, peaking production, and consumer clamoring for different and clean fuel,
X
is keeping us chained to oil.
X could be many things. Even two things at once. Heavy oil infrastructure totalling billions-on-trillions of dollars in refineries, motor plants, stations, service, technical jobs, as well as tens of trillions of dollars [<- weighty... like a weight around the ankles near the noose] in oil fields worldwide.
X could be corruption of existing sticky market systems. Where there is lots of money and not much light, there is probably disorder.
X could be the control that oil and owning oil gives over the world. Controlling oil pipelines and fields keeps some tabs on the production capabilities of the world, ensuring that Egypt or Australia don't begin producing megacheap cars that crash Chevrolet [again] or Ford. Keeping tabs on oil is like roughly by volume like keeping tabs on nuclear power plants. We also seem to get money from every oil trade done in dollars. Petrodollars they call them. This could be 15%-45% of the reason we trade in oil worldwide.
X coulds be the costs of the alternative technologies. The control we get from oil is 50% of the risk reduction. The other ~50% would be lack of the energy chaos that could excite itself from better energy sources. Egypt or Australia could do mostly anything with that much free energy, and our big slow companies believe they could not compete with that, even though they'd likely have first crack, owning the patents.
Is this control system ethical? No. It causes millions of deaths every year, contributes grossly to pollution, and is on a shortening trigger that could seriously kill billions of people. Can it be done economically? Briefly.
What would happen if we switched, if the Bilderburgs switched [we already have] from an oil economy?
It would run like this:
The only seriously viable energy sources outside of oil are infinitely awesome. The Z-machine is the next best choice, because it costs so much. Money is control. Z could produce lots of cheap and fairly clean energy, and we could then do e-cars or something, but it's still $40B+ per plant. Whereas alchemical reactions inside a water splitter are a few hundred bucks. That wouldn't control a Chinaman.
Hydrogen that needs to be stored isn't so great because that makes Hindenburgs. But hydrogen on the spot is grunderful. Stored hydrogen isn't on anybody's list. Except the Archduke.
So if GM announced they were releasing energy technologies tantamount to cheap free energy for anybody basically anywhere, they would be effecting their own primary dismantling, first by losing the value of their oil energy shares, second by losing the best part of the market entry cost of their industry, which they rely on to keep out the riffraff, like this guy. He would use you like *floss*, GM... Unless you floss first.
This is still the announcement. The technology would immediately be duplicated by every supplicant country we own. They would cast off our oily shackles and become far more self sufficient. The only thing they would not have they need to be free from the others' control is technological laboratories and factories, and infrastructure, and the sheer labor required to do it. The good world would probably catch up to us in quality of living and maybe in something like economic production in one decade.
You forget, though, that everything they experience and invent will be ours too.
The division between mankind, primarily caused by terms of space and distance and locality and ownership, will be dissolved more completely by the world of ideas. So many fewer limitations will keep us apart and different. This will make us closer brothers and friends.
The post-oil world will be different. So much more will be possible. That is risk that many out there do not want. Yes, someone will probably organize a death-ray army and try to conquer the world, but even if they win briefly the good folk will a) find out and b) come back and crush them silly.
Why are markets not responding to the rise in the price of oil? Despite $93/barrel oil, risky supply chains, peaking production, and consumer clamoring for different and clean fuel,
X
is keeping us chained to oil.
X could be many things. Even two things at once. Heavy oil infrastructure totalling billions-on-trillions of dollars in refineries, motor plants, stations, service, technical jobs, as well as tens of trillions of dollars [<- weighty... like a weight around the ankles near the noose] in oil fields worldwide.
X could be corruption of existing sticky market systems. Where there is lots of money and not much light, there is probably disorder.
X could be the control that oil and owning oil gives over the world. Controlling oil pipelines and fields keeps some tabs on the production capabilities of the world, ensuring that Egypt or Australia don't begin producing megacheap cars that crash Chevrolet [again] or Ford. Keeping tabs on oil is like roughly by volume like keeping tabs on nuclear power plants. We also seem to get money from every oil trade done in dollars. Petrodollars they call them. This could be 15%-45% of the reason we trade in oil worldwide.
X coulds be the costs of the alternative technologies. The control we get from oil is 50% of the risk reduction. The other ~50% would be lack of the energy chaos that could excite itself from better energy sources. Egypt or Australia could do mostly anything with that much free energy, and our big slow companies believe they could not compete with that, even though they'd likely have first crack, owning the patents.
Is this control system ethical? No. It causes millions of deaths every year, contributes grossly to pollution, and is on a shortening trigger that could seriously kill billions of people. Can it be done economically? Briefly.
What would happen if we switched, if the Bilderburgs switched [we already have] from an oil economy?
It would run like this:
The only seriously viable energy sources outside of oil are infinitely awesome. The Z-machine is the next best choice, because it costs so much. Money is control. Z could produce lots of cheap and fairly clean energy, and we could then do e-cars or something, but it's still $40B+ per plant. Whereas alchemical reactions inside a water splitter are a few hundred bucks. That wouldn't control a Chinaman.
Hydrogen that needs to be stored isn't so great because that makes Hindenburgs. But hydrogen on the spot is grunderful. Stored hydrogen isn't on anybody's list. Except the Archduke.
So if GM announced they were releasing energy technologies tantamount to cheap free energy for anybody basically anywhere, they would be effecting their own primary dismantling, first by losing the value of their oil energy shares, second by losing the best part of the market entry cost of their industry, which they rely on to keep out the riffraff, like this guy. He would use you like *floss*, GM... Unless you floss first.
This is still the announcement. The technology would immediately be duplicated by every supplicant country we own. They would cast off our oily shackles and become far more self sufficient. The only thing they would not have they need to be free from the others' control is technological laboratories and factories, and infrastructure, and the sheer labor required to do it. The good world would probably catch up to us in quality of living and maybe in something like economic production in one decade.
You forget, though, that everything they experience and invent will be ours too.
The division between mankind, primarily caused by terms of space and distance and locality and ownership, will be dissolved more completely by the world of ideas. So many fewer limitations will keep us apart and different. This will make us closer brothers and friends.
The post-oil world will be different. So much more will be possible. That is risk that many out there do not want. Yes, someone will probably organize a death-ray army and try to conquer the world, but even if they win briefly the good folk will a) find out and b) come back and crush them silly.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
