Building a crappy product or making an inefficient system is throwing away labor and its results.

Vehicle Tax and Shift

Inefficient vehicles should be taxed specially and that money go to funding research and development of new fuel vehicles and electric and water splitting vehicles. Or promiting these kinds of vehicles. This kind of legislature and corporate action would very rapidly shift our automotive industry and abilities to moderate our own corporations.

"Tax and Shift" would be a great program. We should keep this one on the books as one of the greatest and most immediate ways to shift from the economy and world we experience to the one that we would wish to live in.

Inspired by music heard at www.radioleft.com.

Material

"The main theme was the same: the efficiency of the justice. It's interesting to fully understand what a cosmic universal economic system is. They explain it as follows: an economic plan, aimed at efficiently satisfying man's needs so that he is released from the tyranny of material things over his daily life."

This can be accomplished in the manner previously described, using 3d nanorobotics for industrial production, Tesla field circuitry for power transmission, and water splitting, motionless electromagnetic generators for power. Raw materials can be harvested and waste can be removed and processed in similar ways made efficient in terms of machinery and manpower by proper engineering. Maintenance should be performed as infrequently as possible by design of products.

The remaining time, which will become a majority of time, can be spent on love, refining social elements, information and communication, kultur, religious study, and building sandcastles.


"In other words, if everyone has everything at his disposal, then the acquisition of material goods is no longer of paramount importance. This can only be achieved by providing "equal shares for everyone"; otherwise envy will always exist. The culture then becomes more or less stable."

>100% efficiency Economics

Economics relies partially on shortage to set price. What do you do if something is abundant? Do you pay for air? No. If energy was as plentiful as air, would you pay for it? No.

We can do this. We are literally swimming in energy right now. It is merely unusable with our current infrastructure, which relies on short supply/labor intensive coal oil and nuclear fuel, even though these things pollute heavily and cause considerable social disturbance.

We can build 8Hz resonators for the Schuman field of earth, or use motionless electromagnetic generators, or water splitting vehicles, to efficiently [w]ring energy from this field into our cars, houses, factories. It would cost as much as the machine required to translate the energy. That cost would be expressed in hours of labor and in pounds of certain materials, and their shipping. But not by their scarcity since no scare resources would be used.

The resultant universal quality of life would be fantastic. The price of all goods would become insubstantial. Your strength would be meaningless in labor. 3D printing nanorobotics could produce all the organized goods we need, leaving us to do computer codework, engineering, or various manual labor, all of which would be equally as free of non-apparent/compensated material value.

Autotrust Companies?

[cont from title link...] Which raises an important point. Can an automaker or a company become a trust by itself, if it is large enough? Can a company of a certain size depending on the market automatically be a trust, regardless of their economic activity, based on the laws of capitalism and standard industry business model?

Whose authority is it to adjudicate international companies guilty of breaking this law? Certainly it must be the World Court, or signatory members of the public World Trade Organization, or a UN Business branch, complete with customer/worker's Bill of Rights.

...or in a world democracy, a referendum jury of the citizens of the countries in which the company does business, weighted by amount of business in $ done in each country, and the level at which the company's entire market share affects business in each country.

This includes companies with a major ownership share in one another. I must call for the analysis of the world investment map. It may become necessary to classify extremely wealthy companies or company-umbrella-conglomerations as individual organizations and determine their ownership of assets to constitute a monopoly or not. As well, a group of companies that own a large enough portion of a market, but which are themselves owned or primarily invested in by an individual or family, or 'investment group' of individuals should be analyzed for breach of contract, classification as 'government' due to the power of their wealth, and counseled or scheduled for legitimacy of owning such a large portion of world power and wealth independent of the laws restraining and defining governments. If these people or companies constitute a 'world government' by wealth and ownership, they shall be subject to the laws defining and organizing any government.

'I admit it' Music: Vocal Trance - Matt Darey Feat Marcella Woods

Political Hotwire

This raises certain questions, if these megacompanies or megainvestors do exist. Because the laws of any single nation cannot rule the entire world, and because of the massive and compelling and frankly *vital* amount of wealth these people or companies control, are they governments? They may control an amount of world resources that are critical assets for the survival of large portions of the human population. If you or your investment group owns some $10 trillion dollars, you are bound by certain responsibilities in the same way that people are bound to the earthen land that you own.

If this corporate bloc decided to stop production, dramatically shift production, or left for Ghana, they could easily replace the majority of West Africa and set up world industry there instead. they would have the power to attract skilled workers from the whole globe and menial workers from anywhere they choose. They would have the money to purchase influence and to work around and through nearly any law they desire.

Do these people exemplify capitalism and the frank right or ability to own enough of the world to excess that it destroys or could destroy others who do not own its money? Tens of millions of people die of lacks in food, medical attention, shelter, and an unimaginable amount of pain and mental anguish result from shortage every year. So long as this corporate bloc has control of this material, they are liable for creating these shortages, as the people in those spaces have *no alternative* but death, as a result of excessive ownership.

I will see you in court.

music courtesy of www.di.fm

RFID Ordering At Bars

"All good reasons to put off fighting your way to the bar if you're a University of Westminster student on a night out. But now the students' union thinks it's found a way for drinkers to escape a busy bar and still get a round in - thanks to RFID tables that deliver orders remotely."

I believe this is a good idea for many crowded locations, but the idea was first thought of by one Stephen Colbert in his speech for President Bush. 'Just speak into the table number, someone from the NSA will be over with your order right away.'

This could be a fine idea if it is bound to the table and secured by a second confirmation button. Maybe a small LED backlit screen. Radio frequency communication by electronics is a fine idea, and I'd like to see RFID phones.

RFID PHONES. My name is William Bunker. <><

Resources

The crunch is over the world's resources. All politics is a filter through which that competition is based. The average citizen is non-competetive for these resources and believes in the power of God, humanity, and technology to adequately supply the world from our stocks of resources feasibly forever.

We need to apportion world resources and study and apply programs for them to be managed properly not most profitably. Money is labor, and resources are finite. An infinite amount of labor is worthless if resources are destroyed. Do not bulldoze crops.

The world is a replenishing breadbasket, but it is also a golden goose. If we cut it open to get everything we will destroy it and ourselves. However, we can cultivate this goose and the universe to last us literally for all time, or until God calls us all home.

A National Sales Tax

"I oppose the Fair Tax (National Sales Tax)

I am deeply dismayed that this kind of tax is being proposed. This is a flat tax, and not only that, but it is an excuse to examine what everyone in America spends their money on. Moreover, it will further seperate the classes and will raise the cost of living without adequately funding the Congress.

If you would establish not-for-profit state run industries instead, they could provide increased employment, decrease the cost of living, instill economic and industrial competition in our national brands, and allow us to modify and lead the market by example directly from the state.

Consider it."


letter to George W Bush and assorted Senators and Congressmen.

Cement Boots

Under Construction:

Report on financial and technological sluggishness due to depth of investment, and willingness to defend this sluggishness up to the depth of investment. Re: Hemp carpets, DuPont chemical, Saudi /world oil.