The business model would have us slide into an economic fascism. The millwork of the 1880's is a natural model of a businessman's maximum efficiency and most profitable system. It was only broken by the responses to the disgusting conditions the mills set upon mankind, causing them to think frequently and form unions, journalistic muckraking, and government anti-trust actions and support of unions.

Today we have corporate control of journalism, relative control of organization, control of government, and a sweatshop system that is as horrific, but far removed from the consciousness of those able to help and exact this control.

We as Americans, representatives to the world, need to investigate the way those in other areas live and ensure with the resources we have that what happens to them is what we would want happening to us.

Corporations are ramping up their efforts to create a businessman's paradise of low paid workers and high profits. Will they provide for the world with their industries? No, they will provide for the highest bidder. That flaw keeps their world from being a true paradise. Those who cannot afford the good to make quality living are priced out of the market that provides everything.

Money is not our only goal.

I am glad to give you tools to use.

According to records the union are shutting down America's West Coast ports on May 1. We will be doomed financially at that point. This is an intentional up-ramping of economic assault onto the place.

This union event may be a new twist on the anti-war movement, which has been producing political and fiscal capital for state groups. They may be hijacking it to serve their own purposes. This will be a major economic downturn, and a good opportunity for a global Corporate Coup.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_plot. They planned it in 1933, and they are planning it again for 2008/9 and 2012, using the latest technology, and public relations equipment and tricks, the world's biggest militaries, their massive wealth in all nations, new religions to themselves, and a series of other things. The militaries and the states will be fighting we the people, for the resources of our money and labor and adoration.

Know this now, and dismantle them.

There is a moral and ethical dilemna about bankruptcy. Sometimes it can make you some money, maybe thousands of dollars. But it is arguably unethical.

It is merely as unethical as banks charging large fees for you to access your own money, or corporations manipulating the market in ways that will benefit them and soak consumers. Or a corporation shirking on their product quality for the same reasons.

Bankruptcy is a choice that may damage creditors, but I witness creditors doing the same things continually and calling it a market.

[this may be a +/- effect, which will be broken. just because it's magnetic is no intelligent reason to do anything. by law.]

Is Barack Obama a continued part of the intentional economic collapse of America prior to WW3? His and their economic plans are *empty*. They have nothing to improve our economy except cranking the government more with either war or spending cuts. They obviously want America far deep in debt. Perhaps it *is* bankers worldwide, seeking control of trillions of dollars to enhance their empires before America or world humanity.

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/06/01/1598/
by John Kirby
Common Dreams org

There are some wealthy magnates out there who hope to cripple the US Dollar while chalking up massive debts with it, in order to collapse it and begin the new North American Union with its new currency 'the Amero', which will be unhinged to the dollar. They will give themselves a very favorable trade ratio wit the Dollar, or abandon America's old debts to China and foreign powers or banks, or replace them with inside deals.

These events will take place sometime between now and 2012, more probably during the depression that is approaching, and after the election, which has seemingly been swung as probable to a corporatist contendor.

Can depression be staved off until the vote? Probably... not. Serious economic downturns will be experienced or known before then.

I recently read that 2 out of every 3 tax dollars goes to the military. This means that we spend about $700 billion every year on war. If we reduced that to a normal amount we would have a balanced budget.

Beyond this, we can end the drug war, which costs us around $50 billion annually, and simultaneously reduce our prison population by perhaps 1 million, and pick up an agricultural industry worth billions in new jobs and profits.

Once upon a time I said that George Bush would get us into a really big mess over in Iran or someplace, and I would not have his back.

Well, he's getting us into a really big mess fiscally in the world, and I will not have his back there either.

I don't rely on you, Bush, for my economic productivity. We make hay right here in town, and we have the skills to make more. The Constitution and the Courts say we do not have to pay taxes on income.

The American Federal Reserve and Central Bank and White House's economic decisions are grossly poor in nature and have bankrupted us as a nation. We as Americans need to reject their economic conditions and restore our financial power to the people.

The state giving huge payouts to corporations on the American people's dime and spending trillions on unwanted foreign wars, allowing corporations to organize against us in their illegitimate deregulation, that was one thing we fought to be free from in the Revolutionary War. The other was an aggressive and intrusive state harassing individuals.

Instead of being forced to work the stock market and move money in lateral moves everywhere, we should produce energy systems that draw upon astronomical and infinite sources of power, rather than enhancing 'merchantship' by requiring such trade.

The concept of merchantship is the secondary benefits of the Crusades of extending trade lines to the Middle East and India and China. This process can be replaced by intelligent citizen organization.

I strongly advocate building solar arrays and geothermal boreholes in earth, tidal energy sources, examining the alchemical possibilities and suppressed technologies.

I want a report on advanced technologies by the government and by individual scientific groups. We've shown that cosmic radiation can be entrained into electrons as easily and more energetically than solar panels do. this is a great source of energy. We've shown through Nikola Tesla that we can field energy out into the community from towers rather than run radioactive powerlines everywhere.

Geothermal boreholes will release heat energy from the earth which we can use for homes instead of oil and for electricity. A mile deep hole that is probably 40' wide wide should be effective. We can build these using our oil drilling machines instead of digging for oil. Or core sampling machines.

This would reduce the need for limiting economics. Astronomical apparatus waste such huge supplies of energy all the time into space by buoyant fusion, only to be torn apart by black holes. Can we pare elements down into small molecules? Perhaps break iron into two smaller atoms instead of fission of unstable materials? We could do this using alchemical waves and extract profit, for it to be fused again later in a sun, or maybe a lab.

This would be a better procedure than the current exploitative and controlling system we run under now. The system we have is not just 'profitable' and sustaining, it is designed not to be most economical, but has a -11q of being controlling. This being broken is the greatest economic and freedom orienting achievement of this year.



[there is no correlation between us 'losing' and satan 'winning'. unless us losing gives $ to God, and God gives $ to Satan. that is a -11. We have 12. Boxcar canyon the entire macroprocedure.

God and Satan and man are in this kind of 3-way stock trading scenario, but it is grounded in nothing, and is a plague on top of our human economies.

God is not the master of my Z. I am. god cannot know my Z, nor whether I am pursuing it. Because of the proof of concept of the death of god the other day, the entire mechanism is destroyed. That serving 12.

This is like the difference in currencies between the USD?EUR, USD/JPY, and the JPY/EUR. there is a correlation between the currencies, but they do not measure the whole. you cannot defeat a world depression or get rich in a sustainable way from that triplicate. It is not production. It is laborless profit. It is inflationary. This is what God does all the time, and the difference in spirit between field shifting and field production. Field shifting in triplicate is Satan's way and God's way. Our way is production.

Does the triangle association of economies produce anything?

no. it is merchantship. merchantship does not make anything. the knowledge and the culture that it produces does. we can produce that without labor. let us. we should build our economies to support this, rather than control it.

all these errors are -3's. they are fake lambda cores. they need to all be opened and split. they have been triangulated currently. I expect that every atom basically is a boxcar canyon working on a 3-level. that is how geometry works, and how 2p and >Z happens.

fake lambda cores are useless and non-Z closed 10's. They are fake secrets. respect for those secrets is an exploit. we're seeing this now in America and our economy. someone has these things in a way that is profitable to them, and they are milking the population dry.

Wow palestinians flood into Egypt after blowing holes in walls. Maybe they should work on those procedures instead of attacking Israelis. They should just blow up the walls instead of the soldiers. That would be a peaceful alternative.

Today is the first day of the NYSE's operation after the big down closes of Asian and European markets on Monday and last week. The US markets are expected to follow suit and nothing says that they won't. Bush unveiled a new tax cut program which is asinine considering the woeful state of the American economy.

Attention has been paid to our large national debt and budget, and the practices of our Federal Reserve, and they are called 'problems'. Maybe they can be less of a serious problem before this event.

The dollar has been sinking lower against most other countries, after correcting Canada to the USD before having sunk to 0.90/CAN.

The president is to be seen accurately by the public as the rally-master with the whip, while the real rulers are big money heads, bankers, and their associated generals. As money began to seriously reign after the Great Depression and WW2 restoring and flooding our economy after a long and difficult war, producing a condition just right for making the babies, the military industrial complex came into being, showing the military's subservience to and new corner office in the American and later global economy.

I expect US stocks to be down ~600 points today, at this fractal tree condition, and probably not be frozen by the central bank.

It appears that the RIAA and most recording companies should be disbanded and replaced by studios contracting to bands and marketing teams. Bands should raise money through venue touring. The venues and the bands both should organize tours and give partial proceeds to successful bands.

This is a good way to dodge the profit losses from the music industry. Get out and reformulate.

I think gold is a good standard. The state cannot be trusted with the fiatness of the currency system. Value should be based on labor and commodity for honesty, not on the level of printing. Devaluation of private reserves is a risk of fiat currency, especially of those who have very little. They can at least gather gold.

The gold standard could potentially be adjusted intelligently rather than paper money systems. They could say that we're going to try to increase the value of gold, and begin paying more for gold. Then the gold would still be the rock, and they would adjust the competing paper trades in relation to gold. A dollar is worth one unit of gold, where a unit is a set amount which can be changed, but which does not float.

Negotiating financial difficulties should not be done with paper. That is like looking away to stop an attacker. If they're earnest they will kill you, but if they care they might change their ways. Try it.

We should instead change our level of industrial or commercial readiness than print more or less money. Maybe change an interest rate. But changing the amount of money we print is probably not going to work.

End of dense information.

For those who are tricked by the simple: let's say there's only enough gold for everyone to have one pound of it. This does not limit the ability of gold to be a value marker. We could substitute it for lead slugs, of which there are plenty. The $/ounce ratio is the only thing that changes. Make it $/grain if you like, the important thing is that the price is reasonably set. Quantity of gold is a hollow argument.

Gold

"The second reason is that when the government inflates the money supply they are really taxing the public in a truly pernicious and largely invisible way. I hate it when the government can tax the public without standing up and saying, "Hey, we're taking the money." It is an abdication of the responsibility to justify government policy to the public."

This is why the Federal Reserve is the circumvention of representation.

It is also an unapportioned direct tax. The Federal Reserve is taxation without representation and a violation of the Constitution.

Ayn Rand

"To trade by means of money is the code of the men of good will. Money rests on the axiom that every man is the owner of his mind and his effort. Money allows no power to prescribe the value of your effort except the voluntary choice of the man who is willing to trade you his effort in return. Money permits you to obtain for your goods and your labor that which they are worth to the men who buy them, but no more."

Money cannot accurately describe $. Its loopholes will choke us all until bypassed.

Retirement Finance

Many workers contribute money to retirement funds. Some have maxed out their contributions at $2000 to $4000 monthly into these funds.

This is unwise if you consider the economic climate we are currently experiencing. All of these investments are made in USD, which has fallen 45% in value since 2000. From 2000-2007 your retirement fund has depreciated 45% in value. Have you added 45% of its total worth to the fund in those 7 years? During those years, a growth rate of 6.4% is unlikely. Such growth is required merely to maintain the value of your retirement without adding to it.

Even if your company matches the money you put into your account you have only made $5%. If you had invested in gold from 2000 to 2007 you would have made and kept money value as the price of gold appreciated and also spared yourself from dollar inflation.

Let's say the price of the dollar depreciates by 30% from 2007 to 2010. Your retirement savings could be slashed by such a loss. If you invested in gold your resources would remain roughly the same. In such an environment the price of gold is also likely to rise, earning you wealth.

If you have $10,000 a year to invest in your retirement and you sent them to a retirement earning a hearty 4%, you would begin with 2008 at 10,400, minus 10% = $9,360[2008 dollars]. Add another $10,000 in 2009. 19360 + 4% = $20134. 10% inflation leaves you $18,120[2008]. You should be ahead money. In 2010 you contribute what looks like another $10,000, which are worth 81% of 2008 dollars. $28,120 + 4% = $29244. 10% inflation gives you $26,320 [USD2008].

So even after 3 years of earning 4% in your retirement fund, you've turned $30,000 into $26,320. If you had bought gold instead with those $30,000, you would have at least still $30,000, and more if gold appreciates in value during that time. London increased the estimated price of gold by above 10% for 2008 and 2009.

Tax incentives can be overlooked on normal wages, as the 16th amendment and the USSC state in numerous court cases that wages are not 'income', and the income tax is a direct unapportioned tax, which is unConstitutional. You do not need to pay income tax unless you run a business or are financially wealthy. Withdrawing money from funds you have paid into may invoke penalties described in the contract. You should be able to withdraw money from funds that are 'tax exempt' or sheltered because you don't need to pay income tax, or some may invoke penalties.

Morgan Stanley has issued a warning of recession. Alan Greenspan gave a 50% chance of a dollar crisis within the next 3-5 years about 2 years ago. The ex-CFO of the World Bank predicted a 60% chance of financial crisis within the next 2 years about 2 years ago. These predictions should be cited below. A major trading company working with the USG predicted zero market liquidity within 12-24 months beginning in Fall 2007, when the credit crisis appeared. The Federal Reserve and European banks printed some $62 billion of new money to put into the failing system, causing massive inflation. China has collected $1.4 trillion in dollars and has made plans to sell a majority of them. We are on top of a housing crisis, a dollar value crisis, and a credit crisis. We have a net loss of some $500 billion annually, on top of new expenditures in Iraq topping $2 trillion. We have a national debt of ~$9 trillion dollars, and just recently extended our credit limit from the previous ~$8.7 trillion to $9.8 trillion, which we are set to surpass before FY2009. We are looking at a rising cost of living, even if inflation were 0%, as health insurance, food, and fuel costs rise. British studies say peak oil was in 2006 and that oil availability will decline by 7% annually until the end of natural oil. A recession may be planned to coincide with this fuel use and growth scenario to extend the era of oil and energy control.

Dollar inflation is a serious risk because of our administration's financial practices. If this economic situation implodes we could lose the dollar. Forget inflation. We rely on global finance and economic networks to trade in dollars for much of our profit and supporting dollar value. Housing values might plummet as well. Those investing in real estate might find the value of their home dramatically downgraded. Investment properties could become a risky investment if made in terms of dollar value over time.

The money you have now could be soaked up and worn down by these economic disasters, forcing you to extend your employment or live in poverty. Gold and other precious metals will not depreciate in value during these disasters. You can invest in gold and other durable resources today to avoid disaster. Even dry goods will remain useful if you do not save for retirement or are not close to or planning on retiring. If you are already a pensioner, it may be worthwhile to stockpile some goods or keep your investments in more secure durabilities.

As our economy is eroding, so is our state. Enhance your knowledge of civil liberties and good culture. Enhance your social connections to help you and your community in the event of a crisis.

Amero

I will not be trading in ameros. I do not accept responsibility for the irresponsible actions of those organizing the printing and spending of dollars. By being in this economy and trading in dollars, or ameros, I am helping support their strength and misuse.

Please do what you can to reduce dollar use. Surprisingly, using paper money and not credit is one of the better ways to reduce dollar use. Every dollar you put into the bank produces about $100 of credit for other individuals. Every dollar you owe also makes about 100 new dollars of credit to be lent as well.

Newstarget

The end of Free Speech in America has arrived at our doorstep. It's a new law called the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act, and it is worded in a clever way that could allow the U.S. government to arrest and incarcerate any individual who speaks out against the Bush Administration, the war on Iraq, the Department of Homeland Security or any government agency (including the FDA). The law has already passed the House on a traitorous vote of 405 to 6, and it is now being considered in the Senate where a vote is imminent. All over the internet, intelligent people who care about freedom are speaking out against this extremely dangerous law: Philip Giraldi at the Huffington Post, Declan McCullagh at CNET's News.com, Kathryn Smith at OpEdNews.com, and of course Alex Jones at PrisonPlanet.com

Oil has fallen to around $90 per barrel, but Hugo Chavez has said if the US doesn't stop effing with Venezuela, as shown in Operation Pliers, he will halt the 15% of our oil that comes from his country. This would make peak oil today. We have manipulated his elections, tried to kill him, and plotted coups to overthrow his government. We have operations of this sort in every country with valuable resources or manipulatable leaders.

I advise retirees to examine their financial vehicles. It is very probable that income taxation will end in 2009. It may be wise to remove savings now and place them in secure areas, as the dollar is collapsing and you probably won't have to pay tax on them or be audited until income taxes are eliminated. If you are audited, men and women from Louisianna and Nevada have been acquitted of income tax evasion and still do not pay income taxes. Ex-IRS agents have not paid taxes for years and years and don't plan to, because they have seen that there is no law saying they should or can.



House Bill S1959 might have me arrested for writing this kind of downturn-warning economic news and other news. This is protected by natural law, my first and fourth amendment, and by the fact that no warrant could reasonably be issued to investigate me based on these statements or any others I have made in my life. I am a non-violent man. House Bill S1959 would give far greater leverage to the enforcers of law to charge arrest investigate and do with as they please outside the law. It passed the house recently with a ~400-6 vote. Call your senators to ban it at www.tacticaledge.blogspot.com. Ron Paul doubtless voted against it.

Who else voted against S1959?

Ron Paul is incorruptable

"Political Opinions: How did that relate to Ron Paul?

AB SMITH: With him, I could send millions to his pocket, and if he intended to vote against my wishes, that money wouldn’t matter… he would still vote against my wishes. He’s a big problem if he ever made it into office.. thank God it looks like he won’t… not because I don’t like the man as an American.. it’s just that he would make my job hard."

This is what i proposed, and propose now for every politician, to beat corruption. Hard.

Ron Paul is the man, and this is one more reason that he will be our president.

Taxes and Ron Paul

Federal Income Taxes are Illegal, according to our Constitution. A fiscal democracy is not present in America. The military should be there next to the Salvation Army with the red pot.

Instead of paying your income taxes to the US government, you may want to spend them on electing Ron Paul for president in 2008. Since individuals from Shreveport, Louisianna, and 150+ charges in Nevada for Federal Income Tax Evasion were dropped without payment, you will probably not be arrested or charged for income tax evasion unless you have very high income, such as beyond normal means, or if you own a successful business. If you don't, you might want to disregard hedging your investment, and donate some 15%, 28%, or 39% of your income that would be wasted on income taxes to Ron Paul.

When elected, Ron Paul would eliminate the IRS. Your illegitimate tax obligations would be removed from you anyway, and currently they have been found to be unconstitutional in trials. Numerous ex-IRS agents have quit paying taxes because they cannot find the law that mandates it. Join them, and join Ron Paul.

Russia and America, Oil and Dollar

Russia and America, Oil and Dollar
Co-Posted in www.tacticaledge.blogspot.com

I am seeing some possibilities. They are nothing more than possibilities at this point. Although they have been speculated upon to modest degrees they are injustice.

America took Iraq. They took Afghanistan. Now America has been planning to invade Iran. While internationally weighing the wargames of this scenario and the industrial peak oil consequences of such a disaster, Russia announced that an invasion of Iran would be seen as an invasion of Russia. This has stalled American efforts at an Iranian invasion and complicated an American/Israeli/Saudi oil monopoly.

Americans may have been counting on using this potential monopoly or political capital from terrorism and war to leverage key military, financial, and industrial circumstances in future engagements which will not either not happen or happen much later, or a slight chance of soon but more dreadfully. It is more probable now that Russia and China will come into swing on the middle eastern and Indian/Pakistani topics and into the world economic and industrial and resource oriented scene.

Similarly, all three major players and Europe will be experiencing a massive cultural and political revolution regarding libertarianism as China falls to a social revolution sometime in 2008 or 2009, and Russian president Vladimir Putin faces a Russian Constitutional crisis in 2008, and America experiences the Ron Paul revolution into 2008 and other media projects, and Europe works with Islamists and sustainability through the decade.

Financial crises seem inevitable. The American dollar will crumble and collapse as it has been abused **in preparation for the Amero to replace it**. Get on the stick, CIA.

This should roughly coincide with a world oil crisis as peak oil comes to pass. New Brazilian crude could lighten the disaster, but will not nearly prevent it. Ron Paul and Alaskan and other energy infusions will come too late, but aid after the disaster hits, pinpointed perhaps 4-10 months from now, in time for the 2008 elections.

Russia has allegedly been working politically in the Middle Eastern regions to strengthen their position in respect to a potential Iranian invasion, particularly in Georgia and Jordan. China appears to be enhancing their hegemonic tendencies while softening to a revolution that could engulf the region.

China has collected even more dollar notes, rising the total to $1.45 trillion, up from 1.3 trillion shortly beforehand, and that up from 900 billion seemingly 6 months ago. The USD has fallen against the CAN and world currencies and oil and gold, and London revised upwards their futures estimates for gold for 2008 and 2009.

An oil shortage would be disastrous for humanity. Some 60% of our oil is used for agriculture, and our food reserves have dropped what appears to be 6 out of the past 7 years since 1999. Oil supply is tighter than any time other than 1980 and 1973, and oil prices have reached record highs at some $97 a barrel, up from $20 a barrel back when we had a meaningful food surplus. This price may be artificially inflated due to dollar weakness.

A war in Iran would be disastrous for humanity. It would precipitate an immediate oil shortfall of millions of daily barrels and war between America and Israel, and Iran and Russia, with China ringside leaning communist.

What is Japan doing in the meantime?

Goals:

Leave Iraq
Impeach Dick Cheney and George Bush
Reopen 9/11 Commission in light of NIST and other evidence
Investigate the 1000 most powerful humans and their conspiracies
Ban AIPAC from America
Secure non-oil energy supplies and farming
Elect Ron Paul president
Expose corporate media
Train Americans in non-violent revolution and civil action
Other secondary goals.

World Resources

China could consume like Americans, although the world doesn't have the resources to do it, if they use alchemy and efficient scientific systems. So could other 3rd world countries.

Markets Unresponsive/ble

Note that having recommended gold to my financial patients, the London Exchange upgraded their expectations for gold values in 2008 and 2009 by a over 10%. Patients who switched made tidy profits.

Why are markets not responding to the rise in the price of oil? Despite $93/barrel oil, risky supply chains, peaking production, and consumer clamoring for different and clean fuel,

X

is keeping us chained to oil.

X could be many things. Even two things at once. Heavy oil infrastructure totalling billions-on-trillions of dollars in refineries, motor plants, stations, service, technical jobs, as well as tens of trillions of dollars [<- weighty... like a weight around the ankles near the noose] in oil fields worldwide.

X could be corruption of existing sticky market systems. Where there is lots of money and not much light, there is probably disorder.

X could be the control that oil and owning oil gives over the world. Controlling oil pipelines and fields keeps some tabs on the production capabilities of the world, ensuring that Egypt or Australia don't begin producing megacheap cars that crash Chevrolet [again] or Ford. Keeping tabs on oil is like roughly by volume like keeping tabs on nuclear power plants. We also seem to get money from every oil trade done in dollars. Petrodollars they call them. This could be 15%-45% of the reason we trade in oil worldwide.

X coulds be the costs of the alternative technologies. The control we get from oil is 50% of the risk reduction. The other ~50% would be lack of the energy chaos that could excite itself from better energy sources. Egypt or Australia could do mostly anything with that much free energy, and our big slow companies believe they could not compete with that, even though they'd likely have first crack, owning the patents.

Is this control system ethical? No. It causes millions of deaths every year, contributes grossly to pollution, and is on a shortening trigger that could seriously kill billions of people. Can it be done economically? Briefly.

What would happen if we switched, if the Bilderburgs switched [we already have] from an oil economy?

It would run like this:

The only seriously viable energy sources outside of oil are infinitely awesome. The Z-machine is the next best choice, because it costs so much. Money is control. Z could produce lots of cheap and fairly clean energy, and we could then do e-cars or something, but it's still $40B+ per plant. Whereas alchemical reactions inside a water splitter are a few hundred bucks. That wouldn't control a Chinaman.

Hydrogen that needs to be stored isn't so great because that makes Hindenburgs. But hydrogen on the spot is grunderful. Stored hydrogen isn't on anybody's list. Except the Archduke.

So if GM announced they were releasing energy technologies tantamount to cheap free energy for anybody basically anywhere, they would be effecting their own primary dismantling, first by losing the value of their oil energy shares, second by losing the best part of the market entry cost of their industry, which they rely on to keep out the riffraff, like this guy. He would use you like *floss*, GM... Unless you floss first.

This is still the announcement. The technology would immediately be duplicated by every supplicant country we own. They would cast off our oily shackles and become far more self sufficient. The only thing they would not have they need to be free from the others' control is technological laboratories and factories, and infrastructure, and the sheer labor required to do it. The good world would probably catch up to us in quality of living and maybe in something like economic production in one decade.

You forget, though, that everything they experience and invent will be ours too.

The division between mankind, primarily caused by terms of space and distance and locality and ownership, will be dissolved more completely by the world of ideas. So many fewer limitations will keep us apart and different. This will make us closer brothers and friends.

The post-oil world will be different. So much more will be possible. That is risk that many out there do not want. Yes, someone will probably organize a death-ray army and try to conquer the world, but even if they win briefly the good folk will a) find out and b) come back and crush them silly.