Receipt For Labor

Newtonian Neoconservatives

2008-08-21T10:37:00.000-07:00

Neoconservative ideologies recommend a fierce level of competition where naturally each newton [unit of force], social action, and dollar of value is spent intentionally or not at all. This is their logical system of law and the Constitution guarantees things they would call inconvenient and meaninglessly expensive. To them nothing is priceless. Any kind of quality of living is purchasable and backed entirely by currency, ownership by control, and their social value networks.

Most people live in economies and networks that have decency, which is more of an average, humanity, sometimes a minimum quota, and averseness to certain risks and a presumed shared desire to uproot the cause of these risks. Many also subscribe to universal truth, which forbids lying except to spare lives. All non-scientific and faith based religious and spiritual practices are in this group. Newtonian Neoconservatives seem to exclude themselves from these ideologies. Their religious practices are most fascinating and likely some of the last or core ideologies to fade into $. Locally prevailing or homeland expressions define them more closely.

This method explains the actions of the American executive branch and the members of the Neoconservative revolution from ~1980 to the present. A Neoconservative would never give JFK's speech on secret societies for the good of our nation. Logically, they would use that secret environment to advance their wealth and advantage over others, even if many were threatened, unless it personally threatened them. Humanitarianism without clear payback is unknown to neoconservatives, even if the payment is public relations. JFK gave that speech in defense of democracy and civil society.

Every good action has rewards, even if they are not apparent, and those rewards will return to you someday. Storing up treasures in heaven is an excellent practice. These men and women are sowing the seeds of a society that is nothing but control, which will become a society that has no new infusions of fitness and nothing new to offer.

Recall again that the Royal Bank of Scotland and Calysle Group memo show that in ~September 2008 there is a scheduled global investor pullout from world economies. This is expected to be a multi-trillion dollar evaporation of funds from financial institutions and markets. The DJIA could easily drop thousands of points that month and global currencies could be destabilized. We are also on high alert for war with Iran before January 2009. Invading Iran would immediately take 3 mbd of oil offline and occupy a massive quantity of American and Middle Eastern resources. This conflict could escalate into a global nuclear engagement between USA, Iran, Israel, Russia, and NATO. The benefit of this would likely be unseen.

Royal Bank of Scotland Gives Latest Economic Warning

2008-06-19T01:46:00.000-07:00

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main second event

The economic hardship risk analysis that has been coming out in reference to the pending economic disaster since the early 2000's came one bead closer when the Royal Bank of Scotland warned on Tuesday of a 'nasty' selloff in the coming 3 months producing the worst economic downturn of a century.

This is a scheduled event in the global market being foretold. The Royal Bank of Scotland mentioned that 'one of the major risks always associated with globalism was putting bankers into a tight spot'. This tight spot is planned for the purpose of overturning the world's markets from government control to primarily business control. A world depression is the ultimate deregulation of markets.

Market share and comfortability of executives is unlikely to decline. Global economic competition is assured to intensify and control will likely solidify in the musical chairs economy for world ownership.

This event system is in the timeline of Carlyle Group's Fall 2006 leaked memo saying that the world economic community had a 12-24 month window after which time there would be "zero liquidity". It began in Fall 2007 with the series of credit crises, and has progressed through American fuel price escalation and dramatic dollar value decreases. This fall, when the RBS has forecasted a massive selloff, is the closing of that predicted window, and may be the culmination of a series of global risks coming to light.

1. Global depression and fuel crisis
2. Illegal war against Iran
3. Domestic crackdowns
4. A rigged 2008 American election
5. A false flag domestic terrorism event, possibly the nuking of Portland, Oregon or another American city by American forces to be blamed on Iran and our enemies.

The HAARP installation in Alaska is a machine run by the CIA and designed to send sympathetic or antagonistic waves to affect the vibration of earth and the ionosphere. Just as HAARP can affect the vibration of earth, alchemy can affect the vibration of an atom or a molecule. Danny Klein's Aquygen from Clearwater, Florida, uses special electrolysis just like the HAARP to crack atoms apart using a special frequency. His test car ran 100 miles using 4 ounces of water.

This invention could solve our entire economic woe. But it appears our companies and governments do not want this for they have bought such patents and concealed them for decades.

It seems prophesied that Barack Obama is the antichrist. The antichrist has been prophesied as a man in his 40's of muslim descent who will charm the world and be adored like Christ. It is probable that Barack Obama, if elected president, will become the sitting chairman of a condensing world economic community during his term.

December 21, 2012 is the day when earth will pass through a once-in-5125-years astronomical arrangement with the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. The years preceding and following this date are similar to the early and late hours on the night of a full moon. A full moon has effects similar to this galactic eclipse, but the power of the entire Milky Way Galaxy will be focused on earth in the way the full moon focuses on earth. The illogical and unwise choices made by governments are the opposite of what a responsible civilization would do to prepare for such an event. The ones who do prepare for this event in truth and honesty are the ones who are the leaders of the human race.

Governments who fail to protect and guide us during this time are shameful piles of beauracracy and abuse.

2008-05-21T01:29:00.000-07:00

I've met numerous people with very rosy economic models which do not explain major market forces in action in the 90's and 00's. I'd like to very finely detail what I believe is happening.

We see a standing operation of a ring of all major companies, any that employs 500 people or more with annual incomes of 5 million or more, all interinvested and held chiefly by perhaps 500,000-5 million very wealthy global investors.

These companies are chugging along in the global economy. They face certain scenarios that they might deal with in numerous ways.

1 intercorporate competition negotiated by interinvestment and ownership
2 Market conditions unfavorable to just one company or owner-family which is interinvested but which has made unique and poor or abusive or disruptive choices.
3 Government interactivity resulting from a populist movement that would disrupt markets or corporate conditions
4 Technological advancement of various kinds

I am most interested presently in the last, #4.

We can speculate that corporate laboratories starting in the 1930's and 1940's became acquainted with ways to produce energy very massively. In the modern era we are experiencing the accumulation of this kind of technology. Imagine that this company family discovers through alchemy a way to get 100mpg carburetors, or how to get energy from water.

What would they do? They could release the technology to the general public or through their company to be distributed to the public. What would this look like in the market?

The technology would be developed and distributed. The simple and high output technology would allow roughly anyone to produce any amount of power in their own home or small business without spending money on oil resources or refineries. These refineries would be devalued to their metal components, or become specialty items. The world's refining capacity which is to 90 million barrels daily of fuel oil currently would be replaced promptly by water engine demand. Too promptly for the companies to profitably restructure their industries or even wash. They would lose that investment to the populace.

The energy market would shift:

Before: GE and friends currently represent roughly 30% of the energy market. They take perhaps $1.5 trillion annually in energy profits, and hold perhaps $15 trillion in infrastructure. They own nuclear and coal power plants, fuel refineries, oil fields and coal deposits developed by contracting agencies. They also own lots of power lines and energy grids. These are all '110%' profitable, making 10% of their infrastructure value each year in money.

After: GE and friends power plants are replaced by all businesses and homes soon switching to water fuel or local water installations, as the technology is cheap enough for $30,000 companies to replace $300 million power plants. GE loses these nuclear power plants and they close. They lose 60-80% of their grids and wires. 30% of homes and industries and businesses buy or are built when new with their own water generators or buy from local plants.

GE could be an active agent in this switch, but selling their power plants and other equipment to generate the capital to do that will reduce their fortune from ~$15 trillion in holdings to only perhaps $6 trillion in liquidity, or will take years and give them $8-12T, during which time a suitable midlevel investment must be made to hold the money/charge for the switch. Immediate introduction would cause $trillions to disappear. [But now we see millions of lives lost.]

What can they do to switch to this technology except foment it? But then fomenting it will crush their fortunes and their market shares and eventually, without massive infrastructure, their fortunes will dissolve back into the populace and they will level off with a fortune of perhaps $500B-$1T after ~15 years, although the utility from the technology will allow that sum to buy them about as much as $15T did before.

They really gain almost nothing from the switch, except the technology advancement rate enhances. If they have secret laboratories or healthcare they would gain truthfully nothing except expanded technological base. If aliens exist and share tech with them they are capos and would gain truly nothing, while losing their social rarity.

So it seems that the technology transmission is a guarded event, and stressful as sex. This probably is a simulation of sex to God or aliens, and maybe a process of sperm selection in other senses.

The GE's interested in keeping their secrecy or cowardly about the revolution purchase their technological competitors and their technologies and make deals with one another not to use or mention this technology. They own media corporations so even the publicized mention of these articles is restricted. They work with governments who have a history of warfare and large militaries. If the enemy got this technology and went to war on us we could quite lose, but for the bomb, which would be a nightmare. So the secrets are again closely guarded and privately developed.

The state wants to keep a watch on this kind of activity and maintain intelligence and control systems. Eventually mankind's population and economic realities become too large for non-freedom technologies and the bubble must be burst. Keeping a lid on populations and these freedom secrets in shortening wars for remaining resource efficiencies such as Iraq, Iran, become less well explained and supported. 9/11 and the war on terror is used as a motivator to keep tabs on humans and to motivate these opportunity wars. They will be unraveled, freedom technologies will escape or be developed or leaked by a big company, the military will break into war or riot when the fake is discovered, the state will crack itself or revolution, poverty and war will break out when the big companies themselves finally fail and become hedged empires and walled cities. 2014, should be over. Nuclear war of these empires is one popular way out. They could be educated instead by companies and the revolution-state.

Chemtrails, knowledge-crapping foods and techniques, supercompetition to focus on the $ not the possibilities.

Barack Obama is the continuation of status quo in the new form. You can see how quickly status quo and the 'backpedal' changing.

Ron Paul would be the exit path out with a dark patch of failed to discuss which is primarily the military, which libertarians fail to address properly. I don't fail to.

Those on the ground [0-$400k] would gain worlds. They have nothing at all to lose from the most rapid dispersion of technology except a global economic collapse from the GE's of the world no longer providing their infrastructure items of electric power and foods.

Intermediating those foods and supplies is a big boon if you can produce it.

#1-3 to be produced soon.

2008-03-31T20:20:00.001-07:00

Hello! How do you feel about Obama? I take it you like him.

Do you know that our telephones currently have pre-crime tone detection? There are certain tones humans use before they are about to commit a crime, when they tell a lie, when they truly mean something or love, and on other unique occasions that our NSA listens for using computers through our telecommunications networks.

I believe that these kinds of systems can and should be used on politicians.

Using a crude method of analyzing the tone of Barack Obama, I have found that he is indeed lying, but that he believes in his own lies, which skews the sensor. I believe this in combination with a number of attractive but non-material concessions has tricked the American people into favoring him in a cultlike way.

I approve of some of his platforms. He has promoted decriminalizing marijuana and I approve of soft drug laws. [The whisper is that soft drug laws will be coming around Thanksgiving, and I do not believe Hillary or McCain approve of drug liberalization, so I believe Obama has been given the top hat for the win by the big wigs in November.]

He wants to create a national healthcare plan, which I believe is unconstitutional to force people to engage in or devote money to, but which I support the provision of for people who want to participate in a nationally-negotiated citizens' healthcare group.

I am displeased with the market provisionof healthcare plans, butI do not think the government will effectively run healthcare to the benefit of consumers. I believe the program will be an additional taxpayer overinvestment and destabilize our nation further. Without changing the private Federal Reserve system, our fiat currency, and major corporations, we will have a difficult time controlling our economy.

We can leave Iraq more quickly than 16 months. I also want to see a candidate act on 9/11 truth and the illegal invasions. Has he sponsored or voted on a bill to impeach George Bush? I will.

His 'Middle East Compact' is not sufficient. We have a congress and a Judiciary that we should employ to review our war crimes in Iraq. Giving this to an international agency is a globalization when the authority lies with we the American people. We can try other national war criminals in absentia in Massachusetts, where I will ask to mandate the arrest and/or absentia trial of war criminals in a way similar to France and Germany's law systems, or try them at The Hague.

His economic stimulus package will further provoke inflation, a more serious wound toour economy. We've experienced over 50% inflation in the years since 2000. We need to balance our budget and not continue to spend as freely as the state does. My plan is to publicize the issue that the Federal income tax is unConstitutional and to ask workers to stop paying it. Numerous cases in our courts have been won on these Constitutional grounds. To honor our nation's foundation and to repair our damaged budget, this is the best economic answer. An extra $5,000 to $50,000 a year from ending a 15-37% annual tax on your income would be a powerful operation.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/578141/political_platforms_of_hillary_clinton.html?page=2

No child left behind has been cataclysmic to our students. I would promote home schooling and special 2nd shift school programs involving teachers and parents together in evenings with students in a more open environment. Students could switch at any time to participate in the alternative grading system and earn achievement awards from day one or the last day of school based on their merit and performance on reviews and tests in the fields of their choosing. This would be a true "A's-per-week" measurement insteadof the A-F scale and relative grading with social promotion.

These policies make me a better candidate for president and for local office. I don't support Barack Obama. I also do not support Hillary Clinton, who is staying in the race to help refine Barack. John McCain's military aggressiveness make him very unfavorable in my book and will not vote for him. My vote will go to Ron Paul for his liberty and freedom loving ways, his sound economics, and for creating an environment that is community-friendly and supportive of truth and investigation.

<>< William

2008-03-26T03:19:00.000-07:00

http://online.wsj.com/article_print/SB120588397192346927.html

WSJ wants to let lenders demolish homes to inflate the price of homes. Population growth is continuing. Homes are needed goods.

Smash good whiskey first.

Fuck YOU.

2008-03-19T21:54:00.000-07:00

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/19/seattle-bans-sale-of-bott_n_92412.html?alacarte=1

Seattle joins SF in banning bottled water. We have a lot of water and the quality of bottled water standards is low. Selling bottled water is an irresponsible practice. We should instead sell thermoses.

Selling thermoses instead of bottled water is less profitable for corporations but it is cleaner and more efficient for our economy and society.

2008-03-16T22:07:00.000-07:00

The business model would have us slide into an economic fascism. The millwork of the 1880's is a natural model of a businessman's maximum efficiency and most profitable system. It was only broken by the responses to the disgusting conditions the mills set upon mankind, causing them to think frequently and form unions, journalistic muckraking, and government anti-trust actions and support of unions.

Today we have corporate control of journalism, relative control of organization, control of government, and a sweatshop system that is as horrific, but far removed from the consciousness of those able to help and exact this control.

We as Americans, representatives to the world, need to investigate the way those in other areas live and ensure with the resources we have that what happens to them is what we would want happening to us.

Corporations are ramping up their efforts to create a businessman's paradise of low paid workers and high profits. Will they provide for the world with their industries? No, they will provide for the highest bidder. That flaw keeps their world from being a true paradise. Those who cannot afford the good to make quality living are priced out of the market that provides everything.

Money is not our only goal.

I am glad to give you tools to use.

2008-03-11T11:35:00.000-07:00

According to records the union are shutting down America's West Coast ports on May 1. We will be doomed financially at that point. This is an intentional up-ramping of economic assault onto the place.

This union event may be a new twist on the anti-war movement, which has been producing political and fiscal capital for state groups. They may be hijacking it to serve their own purposes. This will be a major economic downturn, and a good opportunity for a global Corporate Coup.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_plot. They planned it in 1933, and they are planning it again for 2008/9 and 2012, using the latest technology, and public relations equipment and tricks, the world's biggest militaries, their massive wealth in all nations, new religions to themselves, and a series of other things. The militaries and the states will be fighting we the people, for the resources of our money and labor and adoration.

Know this now, and dismantle them.

2008-03-08T08:24:00.000-08:00

There is a moral and ethical dilemna about bankruptcy. Sometimes it can make you some money, maybe thousands of dollars. But it is arguably unethical.

It is merely as unethical as banks charging large fees for you to access your own money, or corporations manipulating the market in ways that will benefit them and soak consumers. Or a corporation shirking on their product quality for the same reasons.

Bankruptcy is a choice that may damage creditors, but I witness creditors doing the same things continually and calling it a market.

[this may be a +/- effect, which will be broken. just because it's magnetic is no intelligent reason to do anything. by law.]

2008-02-26T00:46:00.000-08:00

Is Barack Obama a continued part of the intentional economic collapse of America prior to WW3? His and their economic plans are *empty*. They have nothing to improve our economy except cranking the government more with either war or spending cuts. They obviously want America far deep in debt. Perhaps it *is* bankers worldwide, seeking control of trillions of dollars to enhance their empires before America or world humanity.

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/06/01/1598/
by John Kirby
Common Dreams org

2008-02-01T22:27:00.000-08:00

There are some wealthy magnates out there who hope to cripple the US Dollar while chalking up massive debts with it, in order to collapse it and begin the new North American Union with its new currency 'the Amero', which will be unhinged to the dollar. They will give themselves a very favorable trade ratio wit the Dollar, or abandon America's old debts to China and foreign powers or banks, or replace them with inside deals.

These events will take place sometime between now and 2012, more probably during the depression that is approaching, and after the election, which has seemingly been swung as probable to a corporatist contendor.

Can depression be staved off until the vote? Probably... not. Serious economic downturns will be experienced or known before then.

2008-01-31T11:45:00.000-08:00

I recently read that 2 out of every 3 tax dollars goes to the military. This means that we spend about $700 billion every year on war. If we reduced that to a normal amount we would have a balanced budget.

Beyond this, we can end the drug war, which costs us around $50 billion annually, and simultaneously reduce our prison population by perhaps 1 million, and pick up an agricultural industry worth billions in new jobs and profits.

2008-01-23T07:15:00.000-08:00

Once upon a time I said that George Bush would get us into a really big mess over in Iran or someplace, and I would not have his back.

Well, he's getting us into a really big mess fiscally in the world, and I will not have his back there either.

I don't rely on you, Bush, for my economic productivity. We make hay right here in town, and we have the skills to make more. The Constitution and the Courts say we do not have to pay taxes on income.

The American Federal Reserve and Central Bank and White House's economic decisions are grossly poor in nature and have bankrupted us as a nation. We as Americans need to reject their economic conditions and restore our financial power to the people.

The state giving huge payouts to corporations on the American people's dime and spending trillions on unwanted foreign wars, allowing corporations to organize against us in their illegitimate deregulation, that was one thing we fought to be free from in the Revolutionary War. The other was an aggressive and intrusive state harassing individuals.

2008-01-23T05:51:00.000-08:00

Instead of being forced to work the stock market and move money in lateral moves everywhere, we should produce energy systems that draw upon astronomical and infinite sources of power, rather than enhancing 'merchantship' by requiring such trade.

The concept of merchantship is the secondary benefits of the Crusades of extending trade lines to the Middle East and India and China. This process can be replaced by intelligent citizen organization.

I strongly advocate building solar arrays and geothermal boreholes in earth, tidal energy sources, examining the alchemical possibilities and suppressed technologies.

I want a report on advanced technologies by the government and by individual scientific groups. We've shown that cosmic radiation can be entrained into electrons as easily and more energetically than solar panels do. this is a great source of energy. We've shown through Nikola Tesla that we can field energy out into the community from towers rather than run radioactive powerlines everywhere.

Geothermal boreholes will release heat energy from the earth which we can use for homes instead of oil and for electricity. A mile deep hole that is probably 40' wide wide should be effective. We can build these using our oil drilling machines instead of digging for oil. Or core sampling machines.

This would reduce the need for limiting economics. Astronomical apparatus waste such huge supplies of energy all the time into space by buoyant fusion, only to be torn apart by black holes. Can we pare elements down into small molecules? Perhaps break iron into two smaller atoms instead of fission of unstable materials? We could do this using alchemical waves and extract profit, for it to be fused again later in a sun, or maybe a lab.

This would be a better procedure than the current exploitative and controlling system we run under now. The system we have is not just 'profitable' and sustaining, it is designed not to be most economical, but has a -11q of being controlling. This being broken is the greatest economic and freedom orienting achievement of this year.

[there is no correlation between us 'losing' and satan 'winning'. unless us losing gives $ to God, and God gives $ to Satan. that is a -11. We have 12. Boxcar canyon the entire macroprocedure.

God and Satan and man are in this kind of 3-way stock trading scenario, but it is grounded in nothing, and is a plague on top of our human economies.

God is not the master of my Z. I am. god cannot know my Z, nor whether I am pursuing it. Because of the proof of concept of the death of god the other day, the entire mechanism is destroyed. That serving 12.

This is like the difference in currencies between the USD?EUR, USD/JPY, and the JPY/EUR. there is a correlation between the currencies, but they do not measure the whole. you cannot defeat a world depression or get rich in a sustainable way from that triplicate. It is not production. It is laborless profit. It is inflationary. This is what God does all the time, and the difference in spirit between field shifting and field production. Field shifting in triplicate is Satan's way and God's way. Our way is production.

Does the triangle association of economies produce anything?

no. it is merchantship. merchantship does not make anything. the knowledge and the culture that it produces does. we can produce that without labor. let us. we should build our economies to support this, rather than control it.

all these errors are -3's. they are fake lambda cores. they need to all be opened and split. they have been triangulated currently. I expect that every atom basically is a boxcar canyon working on a 3-level. that is how geometry works, and how 2p and >Z happens.

fake lambda cores are useless and non-Z closed 10's. They are fake secrets. respect for those secrets is an exploit. we're seeing this now in America and our economy. someone has these things in a way that is profitable to them, and they are milking the population dry.

Wow palestinians flood into Egypt after blowing holes in walls. Maybe they should work on those procedures instead of attacking Israelis. They should just blow up the walls instead of the soldiers. That would be a peaceful alternative.

2008-01-21T23:44:00.000-08:00

Today is the first day of the NYSE's operation after the big down closes of Asian and European markets on Monday and last week. The US markets are expected to follow suit and nothing says that they won't. Bush unveiled a new tax cut program which is asinine considering the woeful state of the American economy.

Attention has been paid to our large national debt and budget, and the practices of our Federal Reserve, and they are called 'problems'. Maybe they can be less of a serious problem before this event.

The dollar has been sinking lower against most other countries, after correcting Canada to the USD before having sunk to 0.90/CAN.

The president is to be seen accurately by the public as the rally-master with the whip, while the real rulers are big money heads, bankers, and their associated generals. As money began to seriously reign after the Great Depression and WW2 restoring and flooding our economy after a long and difficult war, producing a condition just right for making the babies, the military industrial complex came into being, showing the military's subservience to and new corner office in the American and later global economy.

I expect US stocks to be down ~600 points today, at this fractal tree condition, and probably not be frozen by the central bank.

2008-01-15T01:39:00.000-08:00

It appears that the RIAA and most recording companies should be disbanded and replaced by studios contracting to bands and marketing teams. Bands should raise money through venue touring. The venues and the bands both should organize tours and give partial proceeds to successful bands.

This is a good way to dodge the profit losses from the music industry. Get out and reformulate.

2007-12-23T05:59:00.000-08:00

I think gold is a good standard. The state cannot be trusted with the fiatness of the currency system. Value should be based on labor and commodity for honesty, not on the level of printing. Devaluation of private reserves is a risk of fiat currency, especially of those who have very little. They can at least gather gold.

The gold standard could potentially be adjusted intelligently rather than paper money systems. They could say that we're going to try to increase the value of gold, and begin paying more for gold. Then the gold would still be the rock, and they would adjust the competing paper trades in relation to gold. A dollar is worth one unit of gold, where a unit is a set amount which can be changed, but which does not float.

Negotiating financial difficulties should not be done with paper. That is like looking away to stop an attacker. If they're earnest they will kill you, but if they care they might change their ways. Try it.

We should instead change our level of industrial or commercial readiness than print more or less money. Maybe change an interest rate. But changing the amount of money we print is probably not going to work.

End of dense information.

For those who are tricked by the simple: let's say there's only enough gold for everyone to have one pound of it. This does not limit the ability of gold to be a value marker. We could substitute it for lead slugs, of which there are plenty. The $/ounce ratio is the only thing that changes. Make it $/grain if you like, the important thing is that the price is reasonably set. Quantity of gold is a hollow argument.

Gold

2007-12-23T05:06:00.000-08:00

"The second reason is that when the government inflates the money supply they are really taxing the public in a truly pernicious and largely invisible way. I hate it when the government can tax the public without standing up and saying, "Hey, we're taking the money." It is an abdication of the responsibility to justify government policy to the public."

This is why the Federal Reserve is the circumvention of representation.

It is also an unapportioned direct tax. The Federal Reserve is taxation without representation and a violation of the Constitution.

Ayn Rand

2007-12-23T04:29:00.000-08:00

"To trade by means of money is the code of the men of good will. Money rests on the axiom that every man is the owner of his mind and his effort. Money allows no power to prescribe the value of your effort except the voluntary choice of the man who is willing to trade you his effort in return. Money permits you to obtain for your goods and your labor that which they are worth to the men who buy them, but no more."

Money cannot accurately describe $. Its loopholes will choke us all until bypassed.

Retirement Finance

2007-12-13T00:36:00.000-08:00

Many workers contribute money to retirement funds. Some have maxed out their contributions at $2000 to $4000 monthly into these funds.

This is unwise if you consider the economic climate we are currently experiencing. All of these investments are made in USD, which has fallen 45% in value since 2000. From 2000-2007 your retirement fund has depreciated 45% in value. Have you added 45% of its total worth to the fund in those 7 years? During those years, a growth rate of 6.4% is unlikely. Such growth is required merely to maintain the value of your retirement without adding to it.

Even if your company matches the money you put into your account you have only made $5%. If you had invested in gold from 2000 to 2007 you would have made and kept money value as the price of gold appreciated and also spared yourself from dollar inflation.

Let's say the price of the dollar depreciates by 30% from 2007 to 2010. Your retirement savings could be slashed by such a loss. If you invested in gold your resources would remain roughly the same. In such an environment the price of gold is also likely to rise, earning you wealth.

If you have $10,000 a year to invest in your retirement and you sent them to a retirement earning a hearty 4%, you would begin with 2008 at 10,400, minus 10% = $9,360[2008 dollars]. Add another $10,000 in 2009. 19360 + 4% = $20134. 10% inflation leaves you $18,120[2008]. You should be ahead money. In 2010 you contribute what looks like another $10,000, which are worth 81% of 2008 dollars. $28,120 + 4% = $29244. 10% inflation gives you $26,320 [USD2008].

So even after 3 years of earning 4% in your retirement fund, you've turned $30,000 into $26,320. If you had bought gold instead with those $30,000, you would have at least still $30,000, and more if gold appreciates in value during that time. London increased the estimated price of gold by above 10% for 2008 and 2009.

Tax incentives can be overlooked on normal wages, as the 16th amendment and the USSC state in numerous court cases that wages are not 'income', and the income tax is a direct unapportioned tax, which is unConstitutional. You do not need to pay income tax unless you run a business or are financially wealthy. Withdrawing money from funds you have paid into may invoke penalties described in the contract. You should be able to withdraw money from funds that are 'tax exempt' or sheltered because you don't need to pay income tax, or some may invoke penalties.

Morgan Stanley has issued a warning of recession. Alan Greenspan gave a 50% chance of a dollar crisis within the next 3-5 years about 2 years ago. The ex-CFO of the World Bank predicted a 60% chance of financial crisis within the next 2 years about 2 years ago. These predictions should be cited below. A major trading company working with the USG predicted zero market liquidity within 12-24 months beginning in Fall 2007, when the credit crisis appeared. The Federal Reserve and European banks printed some $62 billion of new money to put into the failing system, causing massive inflation. China has collected $1.4 trillion in dollars and has made plans to sell a majority of them. We are on top of a housing crisis, a dollar value crisis, and a credit crisis. We have a net loss of some $500 billion annually, on top of new expenditures in Iraq topping $2 trillion. We have a national debt of ~$9 trillion dollars, and just recently extended our credit limit from the previous ~$8.7 trillion to $9.8 trillion, which we are set to surpass before FY2009. We are looking at a rising cost of living, even if inflation were 0%, as health insurance, food, and fuel costs rise. British studies say peak oil was in 2006 and that oil availability will decline by 7% annually until the end of natural oil. A recession may be planned to coincide with this fuel use and growth scenario to extend the era of oil and energy control.

Dollar inflation is a serious risk because of our administration's financial practices. If this economic situation implodes we could lose the dollar. Forget inflation. We rely on global finance and economic networks to trade in dollars for much of our profit and supporting dollar value. Housing values might plummet as well. Those investing in real estate might find the value of their home dramatically downgraded. Investment properties could become a risky investment if made in terms of dollar value over time.

The money you have now could be soaked up and worn down by these economic disasters, forcing you to extend your employment or live in poverty. Gold and other precious metals will not depreciate in value during these disasters. You can invest in gold and other durable resources today to avoid disaster. Even dry goods will remain useful if you do not save for retirement or are not close to or planning on retiring. If you are already a pensioner, it may be worthwhile to stockpile some goods or keep your investments in more secure durabilities.

As our economy is eroding, so is our state. Enhance your knowledge of civil liberties and good culture. Enhance your social connections to help you and your community in the event of a crisis.

Amero

2007-12-01T02:20:00.000-08:00

I will not be trading in ameros. I do not accept responsibility for the irresponsible actions of those organizing the printing and spending of dollars. By being in this economy and trading in dollars, or ameros, I am helping support their strength and misuse.

Please do what you can to reduce dollar use. Surprisingly, using paper money and not credit is one of the better ways to reduce dollar use. Every dollar you put into the bank produces about $100 of credit for other individuals. Every dollar you owe also makes about 100 new dollars of credit to be lent as well.

Newstarget

The end of Free Speech in America has arrived at our doorstep. It's a new law called the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act, and it is worded in a clever way that could allow the U.S. government to arrest and incarcerate any individual who speaks out against the Bush Administration, the war on Iraq, the Department of Homeland Security or any government agency (including the FDA). The law has already passed the House on a traitorous vote of 405 to 6, and it is now being considered in the Senate where a vote is imminent. All over the internet, intelligent people who care about freedom are speaking out against this extremely dangerous law: Philip Giraldi at the Huffington Post, Declan McCullagh at CNET's News.com, Kathryn Smith at OpEdNews.com, and of course Alex Jones at PrisonPlanet.com

Oil has fallen to around $90 per barrel, but Hugo Chavez has said if the US doesn't stop effing with Venezuela, as shown in Operation Pliers, he will halt the 15% of our oil that comes from his country. This would make peak oil today. We have manipulated his elections, tried to kill him, and plotted coups to overthrow his government. We have operations of this sort in every country with valuable resources or manipulatable leaders.

I advise retirees to examine their financial vehicles. It is very probable that income taxation will end in 2009. It may be wise to remove savings now and place them in secure areas, as the dollar is collapsing and you probably won't have to pay tax on them or be audited until income taxes are eliminated. If you are audited, men and women from Louisianna and Nevada have been acquitted of income tax evasion and still do not pay income taxes. Ex-IRS agents have not paid taxes for years and years and don't plan to, because they have seen that there is no law saying they should or can.

House Bill S1959 might have me arrested for writing this kind of downturn-warning economic news and other news. This is protected by natural law, my first and fourth amendment, and by the fact that no warrant could reasonably be issued to investigate me based on these statements or any others I have made in my life. I am a non-violent man. House Bill S1959 would give far greater leverage to the enforcers of law to charge arrest investigate and do with as they please outside the law. It passed the house recently with a ~400-6 vote. Call your senators to ban it at www.tacticaledge.blogspot.com. Ron Paul doubtless voted against it.

Who else voted against S1959?

Ron Paul is incorruptable

2007-11-10T00:45:00.000-08:00

"Political Opinions: How did that relate to Ron Paul?

AB SMITH: With him, I could send millions to his pocket, and if he intended to vote against my wishes, that money wouldn’t matter… he would still vote against my wishes. He’s a big problem if he ever made it into office.. thank God it looks like he won’t… not because I don’t like the man as an American.. it’s just that he would make my job hard."

This is what i proposed, and propose now for every politician, to beat corruption. Hard.

Ron Paul is the man, and this is one more reason that he will be our president.

Taxes and Ron Paul

2007-11-10T00:03:00.000-08:00

Federal Income Taxes are Illegal, according to our Constitution. A fiscal democracy is not present in America. The military should be there next to the Salvation Army with the red pot.

Instead of paying your income taxes to the US government, you may want to spend them on electing Ron Paul for president in 2008. Since individuals from Shreveport, Louisianna, and 150+ charges in Nevada for Federal Income Tax Evasion were dropped without payment, you will probably not be arrested or charged for income tax evasion unless you have very high income, such as beyond normal means, or if you own a successful business. If you don't, you might want to disregard hedging your investment, and donate some 15%, 28%, or 39% of your income that would be wasted on income taxes to Ron Paul.

When elected, Ron Paul would eliminate the IRS. Your illegitimate tax obligations would be removed from you anyway, and currently they have been found to be unconstitutional in trials. Numerous ex-IRS agents have quit paying taxes because they cannot find the law that mandates it. Join them, and join Ron Paul.

Russia and America, Oil and Dollar

2007-11-08T23:09:00.000-08:00

Russia and America, Oil and Dollar
Co-Posted in www.tacticaledge.blogspot.com

I am seeing some possibilities. They are nothing more than possibilities at this point. Although they have been speculated upon to modest degrees they are injustice.

America took Iraq. They took Afghanistan. Now America has been planning to invade Iran. While internationally weighing the wargames of this scenario and the industrial peak oil consequences of such a disaster, Russia announced that an invasion of Iran would be seen as an invasion of Russia. This has stalled American efforts at an Iranian invasion and complicated an American/Israeli/Saudi oil monopoly.

Americans may have been counting on using this potential monopoly or political capital from terrorism and war to leverage key military, financial, and industrial circumstances in future engagements which will not either not happen or happen much later, or a slight chance of soon but more dreadfully. It is more probable now that Russia and China will come into swing on the middle eastern and Indian/Pakistani topics and into the world economic and industrial and resource oriented scene.

Similarly, all three major players and Europe will be experiencing a massive cultural and political revolution regarding libertarianism as China falls to a social revolution sometime in 2008 or 2009, and Russian president Vladimir Putin faces a Russian Constitutional crisis in 2008, and America experiences the Ron Paul revolution into 2008 and other media projects, and Europe works with Islamists and sustainability through the decade.

Financial crises seem inevitable. The American dollar will crumble and collapse as it has been abused **in preparation for the Amero to replace it**. Get on the stick, CIA.

This should roughly coincide with a world oil crisis as peak oil comes to pass. New Brazilian crude could lighten the disaster, but will not nearly prevent it. Ron Paul and Alaskan and other energy infusions will come too late, but aid after the disaster hits, pinpointed perhaps 4-10 months from now, in time for the 2008 elections.

Russia has allegedly been working politically in the Middle Eastern regions to strengthen their position in respect to a potential Iranian invasion, particularly in Georgia and Jordan. China appears to be enhancing their hegemonic tendencies while softening to a revolution that could engulf the region.

China has collected even more dollar notes, rising the total to $1.45 trillion, up from 1.3 trillion shortly beforehand, and that up from 900 billion seemingly 6 months ago. The USD has fallen against the CAN and world currencies and oil and gold, and London revised upwards their futures estimates for gold for 2008 and 2009.

An oil shortage would be disastrous for humanity. Some 60% of our oil is used for agriculture, and our food reserves have dropped what appears to be 6 out of the past 7 years since 1999. Oil supply is tighter than any time other than 1980 and 1973, and oil prices have reached record highs at some $97 a barrel, up from $20 a barrel back when we had a meaningful food surplus. This price may be artificially inflated due to dollar weakness.

A war in Iran would be disastrous for humanity. It would precipitate an immediate oil shortfall of millions of daily barrels and war between America and Israel, and Iran and Russia, with China ringside leaning communist.

What is Japan doing in the meantime?

Goals:

Leave Iraq
Impeach Dick Cheney and George Bush
Reopen 9/11 Commission in light of NIST and other evidence
Investigate the 1000 most powerful humans and their conspiracies
Ban AIPAC from America
Secure non-oil energy supplies and farming
Elect Ron Paul president
Expose corporate media
Train Americans in non-violent revolution and civil action
Other secondary goals.

World Resources

2007-11-04T10:41:00.000-08:00

China could consume like Americans, although the world doesn't have the resources to do it, if they use alchemy and efficient scientific systems. So could other 3rd world countries.

Markets Unresponsive/ble

2007-11-02T09:25:00.000-07:00

Note that having recommended gold to my financial patients, the London Exchange upgraded their expectations for gold values in 2008 and 2009 by a over 10%. Patients who switched made tidy profits.

Why are markets not responding to the rise in the price of oil? Despite $93/barrel oil, risky supply chains, peaking production, and consumer clamoring for different and clean fuel,

X

is keeping us chained to oil.

X could be many things. Even two things at once. Heavy oil infrastructure totalling billions-on-trillions of dollars in refineries, motor plants, stations, service, technical jobs, as well as tens of trillions of dollars [<- weighty... like a weight around the ankles near the noose] in oil fields worldwide.

X could be corruption of existing sticky market systems. Where there is lots of money and not much light, there is probably disorder.

X could be the control that oil and owning oil gives over the world. Controlling oil pipelines and fields keeps some tabs on the production capabilities of the world, ensuring that Egypt or Australia don't begin producing megacheap cars that crash Chevrolet [again] or Ford. Keeping tabs on oil is like roughly by volume like keeping tabs on nuclear power plants. We also seem to get money from every oil trade done in dollars. Petrodollars they call them. This could be 15%-45% of the reason we trade in oil worldwide.

X coulds be the costs of the alternative technologies. The control we get from oil is 50% of the risk reduction. The other ~50% would be lack of the energy chaos that could excite itself from better energy sources. Egypt or Australia could do mostly anything with that much free energy, and our big slow companies believe they could not compete with that, even though they'd likely have first crack, owning the patents.

Is this control system ethical? No. It causes millions of deaths every year, contributes grossly to pollution, and is on a shortening trigger that could seriously kill billions of people. Can it be done economically? Briefly.

What would happen if we switched, if the Bilderburgs switched [we already have] from an oil economy?

It would run like this:

The only seriously viable energy sources outside of oil are infinitely awesome. The Z-machine is the next best choice, because it costs so much. Money is control. Z could produce lots of cheap and fairly clean energy, and we could then do e-cars or something, but it's still $40B+ per plant. Whereas alchemical reactions inside a water splitter are a few hundred bucks. That wouldn't control a Chinaman.

Hydrogen that needs to be stored isn't so great because that makes Hindenburgs. But hydrogen on the spot is grunderful. Stored hydrogen isn't on anybody's list. Except the Archduke.

So if GM announced they were releasing energy technologies tantamount to cheap free energy for anybody basically anywhere, they would be effecting their own primary dismantling, first by losing the value of their oil energy shares, second by losing the best part of the market entry cost of their industry, which they rely on to keep out the riffraff, like this guy. He would use you like *floss*, GM... Unless you floss first.

This is still the announcement. The technology would immediately be duplicated by every supplicant country we own. They would cast off our oily shackles and become far more self sufficient. The only thing they would not have they need to be free from the others' control is technological laboratories and factories, and infrastructure, and the sheer labor required to do it. The good world would probably catch up to us in quality of living and maybe in something like economic production in one decade.

You forget, though, that everything they experience and invent will be ours too.

The division between mankind, primarily caused by terms of space and distance and locality and ownership, will be dissolved more completely by the world of ideas. So many fewer limitations will keep us apart and different. This will make us closer brothers and friends.

The post-oil world will be different. So much more will be possible. That is risk that many out there do not want. Yes, someone will probably organize a death-ray army and try to conquer the world, but even if they win briefly the good folk will a) find out and b) come back and crush them silly.

2007-10-16T17:33:00.000-07:00

When a company makes bad products, it raises the cost of all products. Seeing a piece of trash on a shelf or in a commercial is a strain on our economy and on the companies who must offer these products and try to sell them to recoup their expenses. Furthermore, they must raise the prices of the products that they sell successfully to make up for the losses in bad products.

A single poorly designed car could cost a car company hundreds of millions of dollars, even if they only make a few hundred thousand models. that cost would be shared among all bottom lines, and in the market-wide competition/market price allowed for other companies.

The Minds of Rich People

2007-10-14T08:19:00.000-07:00

Are rich people always fair? Do they consider other people? Why do they collect wealth? a fiscal arrangement of ownership is not more important than the safety and well being of decent people. This relates closely to the standard of living, quality of life, and level of opportunity in the social environment. Often the mechanisms of wealth complicate the fairness and opportunity of the whole. Others who may deserve it could potentially be doing better in an environment of shortage if the individual conserves their level of luxury. Responsibility is not always wealth. Wealth is always responsibility. Being rich involves being very responsible. Not all rich people are responsible with their money. They often merely focus on gaining more money, rather than using their money in responsible ways. This is present in numerous rich individuals who are very skilled at becoming richer. This harms many people.

www.teddymoney.com

Lifereboot Economic Model

2007-10-14T05:27:00.000-07:00

http://www.lifereboot.com/2007/know-when-to-quit-and-when-not-to/

This article highlights some flaws of a supercompetetive system.

"The above graph represents the relationship that existed between the amount of work I was doing on the job and my income while working there. Since I earned salary, my income was constant. Since I am proactive by nature, I took on additional projects outside of my job description. The result? Being taken advantage of by my employer for two years.

Now, this wasn’t my employer’s fault — we just weren’t the best match for each other. The job was definitely more suited for someone that would take the “do the least amount of work possible without getting fired” approach. Consequently, my “go getter” approach didn’t fit in."

Contractual labor that provides the same kind of support that a 'normal' long term company job would provide seems wise. Individuals skilled in their field of study can contract with any company they like on any term basis, both worker and company choosing applicants from pools.

Santa Claus Machine

2007-10-14T05:16:00.000-07:00

This machine can be used to build products from electronics to cars. By building a machine to do this with forged metals, perhaps by using a heated applicator on a mechanized arm, we can achieve amazing results. Or we can use special sealants or heat treatments on components for combustion or temperature products.

Mike Gravel?

2007-10-09T22:13:00.000-07:00

Some candidates oppose illegal immigration, but want them to use Social Security while they are here illegally. This is an obvious scam to get them to contribute the SS without ever being able to collect from it.

To reduce illegal immigration we should remove the NAFTA and CAFTA programs and the WTO, World Bank and International Monetary Fund and rewrite the farm bill and end the war on drugs and promote a scientific solution to the world's energy crisis. That will level the playing field. Building a wall is like making a dam in a river without providing a meaningful way through nor a lake. It will burst and be overflown.

We should also leave Iraq and not invade Iran. We should ban the Real ID act, end the NAU, step out of the UN and eliminate the IRS and Federal Reserve.

Greater Than Economic Equality

2007-10-02T18:06:00.000-07:00

See notes on number theory regarding economic level systems. 5- action 6- review 7- justice, correction 8- equality, 9- mind 10- existence

Currently we operate in an "8th level" economic system. It is basically open market, anyone can buy anything for any reason, as long as they have receipts for labor aka money. Reciprocation and equality, and this can be fine in an infinite system, as infinity is also "8" This is also tainted with '7-justice' economic system symptoms, such as drug and weapon laws, and an element of tax redistribution tainted with the -1 of theft/corruption/usury.

A 9-based economic system, the next level, is intelligent economics, and to receive economic support for intelligent reasons rather than universally exchangeable reasons. an organization of individuals using money and labor together for the purpose of their choosing, or anyone participating in any desired organized group activity for a goal using their money is an example of a successful 9th level economic system.

Currently we experience economic chaos, with excessive competition and 8>9 mind conquering economics, putting the mind to work for infinity rather than love. Money can be anything. Do you want to labor to make infinite anythings, or what you want?

In 9 we all make what we want, and pursue our dreams and desires for a world. Organizations rock based not on budgets or competition, but on sustainability, justice, and the mental faculty of the piece of equipment or tool. This is why people buy things, anyway, to sustain themselves, for justice, or a mental faculty. No other reason.

2007-10-02T00:03:00.000-07:00

Insurance, not bombs.

2007-08-20T01:08:00.000-07:00

Considering the incredible and nearly unprecedented level of market risk at this point in history, it is almost rude to find investment diversification programs and retirement Roth IRA schemes.

http://www.investopedia.com/university/20_investments/

This is run by Forbes, a NWO company.

Liquidity

2007-08-19T02:37:00.000-07:00

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,24897,22263613-643,00.html

THE telephones have been running hot between central bank governors but there has been no co-ordinated effort to bring the global liquidity squeeze under control.

Reserve Bank governor Glenn Stevens said yesterday he had held discussions with several of his foreign counterparts over the past week to see what was going on.

"But there isn't any co-ordinated activity that I'm aware of that is going on among the central banks," he said.

"There is just routine information sharing."

Testifying before the House of Representatives Economics Committee, he said central banks in the Asia-Pacific region were in contact on a daily basis and this had been taking place "with more intensity than normal".

&&&

It seems that the Federal Reserve's willingness to pump in/lend money is a deviation from market, and propping up a seemingly dangerous loan. However, the authority to print money at their leisure comes from them, illegitimately, while the labor is 'ours'. This seems to mean that they set the price of our labor, and decide whom to loan money to. They have the responsibility of managing the system to maintain itself, but they choose how and for whom it profits, and if they choose, when to replace or end this system. These are our liberties.

I'd rather see a tightening than a hemorraghing. And more than that, I'd rather see market strength and justice.

This, also, is quite clearly the reduction in liquidity that Carlyle Group was discussing.

Carlyle Group, the Amero, and Energy Policy

2007-08-18T05:43:00.000-07:00

You may recall Carlyle Group's memo issued in Fall 2006 saying that the market is expected to have liquidity for an additional 12-24 months. Currently, we are approaching the 12-month open window. The window will be closed not later than Fall 2008. The CEO of every major company on earth is aware of these figures and this memo.

On the opening of this window, we are experiencing large inflation figures, Federal Reserve cash infusions to the tune of $62 billion in one event, and a national credit crisis pertaining to mortgages.

What factors might influence the closing of this window, and what does its closure mean? Knowing these things we can drop any fear about the crisis and begin becoming prepared.

The event being described in this memo is a global economic collapse. The dollar's value will plummet. Our nation's debts will become unpayable and the Federal Reserve will likely print excess money to pay for our debts without tethering the large infusions necessary to value, labor, or resources. The world will likely be experiencing a fuel oil crisis. Combined with a lack of meaningful currency, this will make fuel out of the price range of the average citizen and make corporate profit difficult except for those associated with certain trading groups, which will likely use a new currency backed by oil reserves, such as the new "Amero". The Amero will also likely be associated with RFID/Real ID electronic trading accounts.

This terrible economic condition will last so long as our energy comes from oil. We could combat this scenario by using gold and labor based reserves and currencies, and by using salt water power instead of oil in our engines and homes. This will form a counter-currency to replace the doomed Amero and dollar, and the cultures associated with them.

http://www.magistrala.cz/freeenergy/?p=13
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kKtKSEQBeI

DOW vs inflation

2007-08-16T01:24:00.000-07:00

According to our inflation figures, our dow high of 14000 is only worth 7700 dow jones points from Y2K.

Reserve to Print More Money

2007-08-11T05:22:00.000-07:00

The federal reserve says that it will not allow the market to grind without excess capital. This is functionally saying that they will continue to provide loans even if the credit rating sinks extremely low and inflation becomes high. This is not a consolation to a secondary condition of a market without substantial reserves. The overwatered market will drown and the dry market will merely chafe and provide more technological motivation. A medium between these two might be possible, but it will be tempting to print more money to solve the problems in the short run.

Free Market, Libertarianism, Friedman, Kanzius

2007-08-07T21:05:00.000-07:00

I could appreciate the free market works of Milton Friedman and Ludwig von Mises more if they accounted for the non-free market effects of megacorporations and the Federal Reserve. I believe these two types of organizations work strongly to undermine the free market.

Furthermore, I would like to know their stance on John Kanzius' salt water burning radio device. It seems to eliminate the concept of energy shortage and radically change the realities of industrial economics. We need new laws and theories for those economic conditions.

What if you could produce electricity and heat without a margin? How would this affect the costs of industry, or would it make economics simply more 'airlike', presuming that we don't have to pay for uncompressed breathable air.

2007-07-30T18:44:00.000-07:00

I have heard people advised to use Roth Conversion IRAs, which involve paying taxes now rather than later.

This is a fool's choice, because of the upcoming IRS revolution. We will probably not be paying income taxes by 2010. You might want to allow your IRA to lay as it sits, and cash it out without paying taxes either now or then instead of now only.

Also, your retirement is going to be rocky fiscally, because of the gross economic disruptions pending this year and next. Putting away money elsewhere and hoping it grows to beat inflation and economic loss is a far second place to gold in a safe and a rifle, pistol and dry goods. You'll need those. You won't need so much cash, nor be able to use it as well.

2007-07-30T17:32:00.000-07:00

According to the radio, the market is down 5% this week.

2007-07-25T22:58:00.000-07:00

What will happen when peak oil strikes and these various war methods are effected?

It seems that a portion of the population will begin working towards a sustainable economic and social environment, and another portion will work with the state or major organizations to compete for the remaining oil supplies. Fortunately, there is a large wealth of extremely exuberant energy technologies in the hands of ExxonMobil and other energy companies, and new energy technologies have been invented and remain in public space where they can be used in civil applications.

This will be an event chain likely to coincide with the 2008 presidential elections, around when numerous forecasted "pullable" economic failures will come to a head, and a probable break of continuity is expected in the American system of authority and leadership. If all goes well, this will be under Ron Paul.

Before this time, an impeachment may occur, or legislative cases regarding Osama bin Laden or other executive fraud, or appropriate technology may become widely known, or another major intervention or massive act of false flag terrorism, or we may invade Iran, precipitating economic meltdown. This would force a Constitutional crisis amid economic meltdown, as the 2008 election is expected to do the same, but amid a scheme to take over control of the public's rights and authority by a fascist state or corporate state.

Heavy Sustainability

2007-07-25T20:44:00.000-07:00

It is important to the American and world economy that sustainable industrial and commercial private practices begin. We are about to face an economic disaster the like of which the world has never seen.

Documents from Carlyle Group say that the market will have liquidity for 12-24 months, reported in spring 2007. This means that between spring 2008 and spring 2009, the world's financial resources will dry up almost completely, leaving little more than infrastructure for economics to work with. This is "The Grinding Halt". Alan Greenspan predicted an American dollar collapse at 60% within 3-5 years, reported in 2006. This translates to 2009-2011. The ex financial officer of the World Bank predicted a worldwide economic downturn at 70% within 3 years in 2007. That comes to before 2010. We are also expected to begin the age of peak oil in about driving season "2007/2008", reported in 2005. Hugo Chavez of Venezuela said that the age of cheap oil was over in 2006. Market consequences are expected to arrive within 18 months after that period. All of these events are slated to occur in the same 3 month period, and more than likely, the same 10 day period.

The dollar has been collapsing in value since 2000. From 2000 to 2005, the dollar lost 35% of its value. On July 24, 2007, the USD sank below the Canadian dollar, trading at 1USD/1.04CAN. Every indicator regarding middle class and lower class income has fallen substantially and with high consistency since 2000AD. Labor density in America has fallen substantially.

We sold off our manufacturing base in the 1990's and 2000's especially, exporting jobs that would otherwise support Americans. Illegal immigrants are not the largest source of job competition, it is politicians, followed closely by robotics.

College tuition costs have risen multiple times faster than inflation for more than a decade. The percentage of American jobs requiring a college degree has also increased dramatically. College coursework and educational achievement levels have decreased. Most colleges now offer remedial writing, for example. Funding for education and healthcare have forced hospitals and schools to cut their staff and course offerings while increasing class sizes.

We borrow a majority of our money from China, who holds some $950 Billion in cash. They have announced that they will substantially reduce their holdings of US Dollars.

Americans today face the worst job market since the Great Depression. The fiscal divide between rich and poor has not been greater since the 1920's/1890's. Quality of living in America has decreased.

We have the amazing fiscal burdens of two major wars in the Middle East which continue to be waged, costing hundreds of billions of dollars, with an estimated 700-800 billion dollars reserved to be spent in those arenas. A heavily promoted war with Iran in the upcoming months would totally bankrupt the USA, begin the onset of global peak oil, causing the crash of every major national market except Saudi Arabia and certain other oil producing economies, and trigger 6-12 major wars for resources, likely turning into one major world war over oil. This would also likely cause a global food shortage as shipping food any substantial distance would become unprofitable and growing it would require more oil than is financially available.

This is a fiscally unthinkable time for an average American to start a family unless they have an indispensable technical degree or technical knowledge required to build a free energy machine, or a military allegiance.

An Ex-CIA has said that 2007 is to be the year when 'all cards are laid on the table'.

Who would be allowing or exacerbating this series of serious economic disasters? Their consequences will likely be the cause of ~2-3 billion deaths from starvation and wars. There is no way to shield 'America' from the consequences of these fiscal actions. There will be massive and major American cultural and personal destruction as a direct result.

See data on Smedley Butler. Search for data on the Georgia Guidestones.

Now is the best time to move any financial capital you have, and convert it into accessible actuated assets.

Urban environments

2007-07-24T19:46:00.000-07:00

3rd world cities are environments of exploitation. They have high populations because of the poverty of the surrounding countryside and the presence of numerous people and jobs in the city. However, all but the upper controlling crust of the rolling displacement free jobs are at depressed wages in an overcompetetive environment to suck in and trap users into poverty.

Tell me about your anarcho-capitalism, libertarian economies, and sustainable free energy systems. How could you live without the support of any company larger than 4,000 humans?

Dubai will not be running their economy on oil within 40 years.

USD < CAN. July 24, 2007.

Hitler = $

2007-07-18T17:10:00.000-07:00

instead of offering aid, change the system.

2007-07-15T11:14:00.000-07:00

One of the things I am most concerned about Ron Paul is the conspiracy and control of corproations. They seem to have infiltrates the state and organized to control the major resources and economies of the world. How would Ron Paul prevent companies from illegally affecting the market? A conspiracy or anti-trust law?

Ron Paul's Economics

2007-07-15T10:41:00.000-07:00

Ron Paul, under your economics, we would eliminate the IRS and state bureaucracy. This will leave more money and control to private individuals.

Eliminating the income tax will enhance the wealth of the average citizen. I would enjoy another 15-37% of my income. This will produce a greater quantity of income available for commercial and industrial growth.

Reducing government spending in a tight economy, the state will print less money and begin to balance itself fiscally. This will reduce the inflation tax, which is about 7-10% annually.

By returning to the gold/asset standard our currency will become well backed. Currently they are unhinged and privately owned and we're 'sloshing'.

By not going to wars around the world and reducing our spending on the military industrial complex we can increase labor density, productivity, and value.

The majority of the wealthy pay $0 income tax per years because of their CPA's and loopholes. Eliminating the IRS will have the best returns for the poor and middle class.

In the future, using current technology...

Combine this effect with enhanced robotics platforms, large scale and also widespread small scale nano/robotic industrial systems will build parts cheaply from low grade raw materials anywhere in the world with less skill and human labor required. The productivity per worker and per man-hour will increase by 20-100X [twenty to one hundred times as much productivity].

A market that sees zero point or passive transport energy machines, patents currently owned by ExxonMobil, can replace their energy distribution systems with point-based workshop kits. Thousands of miles of power lines could lay dormant.

A state with workshop-based industrial production, local energy production and consumption, and decentralized currency systems will produce, by today's standards, very rich average citizens, enjoying lots of high technology goods and a society not pressurized by market-driven economics, consumerism, or over-competition.

Ron Paul is the next step in this economic and libertarian revolution. The technology exists and the limiting factors of the time frame for using it are approaching at our doorstep.

2007-07-06T16:11:00.000-07:00

How to control humanity or survive without controlling it through taxes and totalitarianism.

The opposite of totalitarianism is libertarianism. You cannot control humanity through totalitarianism in the presence of universal technologies nor freedom. You do not need to, however.

All the conditions humanity needs to survive are available using special technology. Even the open public knowledge of these areas should be sustainable and benefit each seclusion.

A system of complacency is not sufficient for bulk humanity. There are many fruits of humanity that go to waste and do not contribute to improving humanity. There needs to be an induction system into a new semisegregated system utilizing and advancing or spreading this technology and knowledge and freeing these slaves from destruction.

Experimentally,
The outside world can handle itself, frankly, and be picked from in positive manners. Because of technology there is no need to harvest wealth from the now poorest regions of earth, nor a need to designate 'capos' as American or first worlders over their branches of society or the greater world as a whole. and receive that technology.

The threats of humanity are minimal. The benefits of advancing enlightened society are grand. Mankind need not be a problem, but can be a positive resource to stratify. Secluded folk seem to not be substantially motivated to induct new individuals or societies because they have no particular need, but to be and recognize goodness.

In short I am vastly disappointed in humanity and recommend solutions be found. We are producing garbage to cover a landfill for no known reason but itself. This should be 'stopped'.

The Largest Companies

2007-07-06T15:30:00.000-07:00

AolDisneyTimeWarner contains the following companies:

The WB, CNN, HBO, Cinemax, Cartoon Network, TBS, TNT, America Online, Mapquest, Moviephone, Netscape , Warner Brothers Pictures, Castle Rock New Line, 1a hunit fifty magazines, atlanta braves baseball team.

Time. Six theme parks. ABC. ESPN yo it ain't for free. 150 Magazines, A and E. Lifetime 72 radio stations and 10 TVs. We got money. Disney Channel. Warner Brothers. Hanna Barbera.

Bellsouth, Verizon, they own it.

DC Comics.

Time Warner and Disney made 75 billion dollars in 2005. GM made two times that much money. Off you.

Ford

2007-07-05T00:46:00.000-07:00

Ford has no legitimate homosexual agenda. They were being appropriated by purposefully degrading PR. Perhaps their stock levels are being quashed so they can be bought out by a competetor on arrangement, such as ExxonMobil or GM.

This looks a lot like manipulation.

Opec to reduce production if demand falls

2007-07-02T13:48:00.000-07:00

Good, this is what we would want. Opec has said it will cut investment in fields if customers become more efficient. This means that a reduced level of demand will be met with a reduced level of production. Good. The article was positioned to be a threat, but the threat is nonexistant.

Anarchocapitalism

2007-06-30T15:56:00.000-07:00

Anarchocapitalism in my book is when major corporations are largely replaced by small businesses and individual craftsmen. This setting would be augmented by a smaller state-level service core in competition with anarchocapitalism in most markets and providing impartial justice and police systems and oversight of public resources such as airwaves and parks and a national-level service providing contingent condensation points for minute-organization armies in the event of major action, and services covering a very large area, such as interstate highways, macros/internets, and national justice.

This will be made possible by virtually eliminating overhead on business with efficient post-oil energy technologies, and the introduction of advanced prototyping and production machines such as the RepRap. Combined these will allow anyone to install a machine shop in their garage for under $40,000. Internet sales and distribution can be easy with internet salesmanship and webcamming. This will allow many engineers and machinists to beat major corporate productions.

Combine with eliminating the IRS to improve public fiscal ability. Allow private education and new microindustrial potentials to compete with public education and universities for a new labor model. Allow sites like www.Duck9.com to compete with major banks and financiers and eBay-level daisychain business to overtake major institutions, while providing judicial and agreement security.

This will make a new economy and a freer and more agile society. Labor will shift substantially and qualities of living will improve.

Ending the war on drugs and replacing it with education and social campaigns will be effective and raise values of urban real estate. Changing traffic law enforcement away from speeding tickets and towards road safety will be effective. Policework will shift away from traffic violations for state and local income and drug policy enforcement to solving true violent crimes. New education systems and social and business opportunities should replace a large amount of dereliction and dissatisfaction and get a greater percentage of society participating in their dreams vs compromising.

Eliminating the IRS

2007-06-27T13:05:00.000-07:00

The best way to distribute wealth fairly is not to change tax codes. We should eliminate taxes, because they favor the rich and harm the poor in their cost of living. We can redistribute wealth more effectively by limiting the excesses of big business and improving technological benefits given to the public and to commerce and industry and promoting labor.

Wooden Car

2007-06-27T12:52:00.000-07:00

How much easier and cheaper would it be to build this car if your energy came free from splitting water and you were equipped with a RepRap parts maker? You could design your own engine and body, and throw it together in 600 hours or less instead of the 2000 this man required. It would also likely drop the price of the finished product by 2/3, including savings on public materials.

Since the RepRap and other synthetic building machines replace the need for many conventional tools and allow a better design process, it may reduce the overall cost of equipment.

Nanorobotics by the mid 2010's.

Robot Money

2007-06-27T01:01:00.000-07:00

There are no banks in MMORPGs because the money is not real. You in the world who are about to make money as real as a 'credit' need to balance the value of that credit with the unlimited level of material and energy inherent in ExxonMobil technologies of unlimited energy and manless production.

Why would someone 'borrow' money in an MMORPG, where they have no ID and any money they do produce in the game is based on their real money they installed into the system?

The revolution in industry and technology will doubtless be cataclysmic for gamers, as the games will need to reflect a world without the kind of shortage experienced in the past, except for time, which all games have infinite of, but without patience to match, of course.

Living Management

2007-06-19T22:34:00.000-07:00

#27 Take mini-retirements. Don't leave the joy of retirement until you are too old to enjoy it. Do it now, while you're young. It makes working that much more worth it. Find ways to take a year off every few years. Save up, sell your home, your possessions, and travel. Live simply, but live, without having to work. Enjoy life, then go back to work and save up enough money to do it again in a couple of years.

Shotguns

2007-06-19T15:29:00.000-07:00

This story is in the fiscal section versus tactical because it is pertinent to the commercial sector. Recognizing that the 2nd amendment is a civil right, businesses that violate citizens' and employees civil rights, or fire them for civil service reasons should be reported to the BBB.

Ron Paul

2007-06-19T11:34:00.000-07:00

Ron Paul chairs a Constitutional and fiscal revolution that will long outlast his term.

Oil Industries

2007-06-19T00:00:00.000-07:00

Good, infrastructure is shifting.

This should have happened in 2005, or 1995. We're going to crash into peak oil, but our oil refineries are preparing for the event, and automakers are shifting to biofuels. Biofuels might be a good medium between oil and e-, to help clean the planet's air and reduce carbon dioxide and other emissions intermediate to energy sustainability.

ExxonMobil technologies need to be released in a dynamic suitable to human social pathology. No level of material or technology will 'cause' humanity to detox itself as a group. We're going to have to be cooperatively reconstituted. Hence biological research, cloning, sociological empathic psychology, spiritual functionality, ecology, ethics and morality, and sustainability.

God, please prepare us.

2007-06-04T23:46:00.000-07:00

China's stock market dropped something like 8%. I speculated openly this past weekend that America sold its mfu base in preparation for peak oil, at which point we will break out the new Exxonmobil energy technologies and outfox those whom we recently sold our base to. We have seeded our competetors with poor technology in preparation for our own scheduled crisis/release.

Peak oil is scheduled for the early quarters of 2008. Perhaps summer driving season. It will be more like a biquarter event of scaling prices, during which time we can produce media spotlights on our most favorable (c) technologies and build new industrial bases and make use of American, Mexican, and Iraqi[/Iranian] oil to produce a peak oil spike that our competetors will not be able to follow.

"Will we need Iranian oil in the future to corner the market?"
vs
"How much will it 'cost' to get that Iranian oil?"

^hideous.

Will we be able to use this market condition to improve society, or not? We have not been successful in accumulating a positive association between wealth and goodness of society. Our many dynamic efforts to shake out society have been thwarted and thwart ourselves. They are also beginning/continuing to 'poison the well', as are our politics globally.

We've formed a chunk that will not get through our filter. What do we do about this chunk and about our filter? Both have failed.

You fail.

You lose all major assets. You lose all major control. The successful portion is vapor off the top, which reorganizes into a new mesh.

Money and Politics

2007-05-23T21:31:00.000-07:00

I've seen a trend since bank decentralization in 1980, Neuromancer in 1984, NAFTA and prescription medication television and meagazine advertisement ~1996, and megacorporations and mergers in the late 90's and early 2000's, and the ~entire Bush Presidency [and HMOs] moving money and services away from the middle class and citizenry and towards major corporations and wealthy individuals.

If Ron Paul is elected president, would he eliminate the IRS to put more money in the hands of the wealthy?

-It is possible to change tax rates so anyone making under ~$60,000 pays no tax at all. This alone would be a 15-28% pay raise for everyone on the bottom shelf of society. The majority of businessmen and big businesses pay no taxes whatsoever and do so for years and years because of write offs, incentives, and chicanery written into tax code. Tax accountants have been taught how to file through these loopholes. Eliminating them could make us fiscally sound again.

Would Ron Paul reduce services and state funding of healthcare and education systems?

-It is possible to reduce services while improving quality of living. Our public schools are not worth sending the average student to. Our colleges are freakishly overpriced, and our job markets mismanage our educational requirements. Public healthcare is treated like a business. We should change our education system to serve us and our children and workers, and change our healthcare system to serve the same. We must also make pharmaceutical companies move beyond the chemical additive level and into engineering the human.

What would Ron Paul do about the American military complex and the world's military condition?

-The world spent $1.05 trillion on the military in 2005, and America's finances account for about half of that. Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Truman fought or warned us about the military industrial complex. Nixon and Reagan embraced it, George Bush has revived it. It is time to put this monster to sleep. America must not profit from war, and must avoid it unless it is necessary like D-Day and VJ-Day were necessary. A media and corporate complex to go with and sell it are ways corporations shoehorn us into profitable and expensive wars that degrade us and the world.

It is important for people to become wiser about their money, civil vs play vs D/s society, and sustainability. I firmly believe that Ron Paul would fix our economy and dismantle the organizations that fiscally control us and the world.

Out of Business

2007-05-13T16:19:00.000-07:00

Each industry and company should seek to put itself out of business. Not through poor business decisions, but good ones, such as eliminating their product or service from necessity by their market. This will cycle humanity quickly through technologies. For example, a dentist should strive to eliminate cavities and to perform as few dental procedures as possible. A soda company should seek to make their product non-addictive but pleasant and healthy, and eliminate as much extraneous nutrition functionality as possible from their foods/drinks. Casual snacking or drinking is not something that a soda industry should promote. In the same way advertising should be minimized or eliminated but for the service of listing the product as 'for sale' or 'available'.

This will improve mankind's quality of living and reduce the cost of living while tightening and tuning our economy to necessity.

12-24 months

2007-04-28T09:34:00.000-07:00

This is the time frame for fiscal crisis that we're working on:

Carlyle Group says that within 12-24 months excess market liquidity [$] will dry up. The longer they wait, the more $ they make, but the longer they wait, the worse the crash is. This is forecasting the Great Depression Mark II.

"Internal Carlyle Group Memo: Market Good For 12-24 Months"

In 12-24 months, we will likely hit "peak oil" [see required reading]. We will also be in the ballpark for an American currency crisis, as forecasted 60-70% likely within 3 years [2005/6 -> 2008/9]. Preparations for this condition have been in accordance for years, and the fruit of it is coming due.

There is a possibility that instead of nothing, we will have everything. This is largely dependent on organization of society and various technology preparations.

In some cases, I think we want ourselves/certain ways not to win, and to crash horrifically, because of the fool choices they make and promote, and the not true things that they believe.

What do you want to have in 2010? 2020? Think.

Debt is an unreal number

2007-03-02T19:47:00.000-08:00

Fantastic news tonight from the US Labor Secretary in interview.

"03 02 2007: US Labor Secretary indicates that we're ready to switch to a 'very sustainable' free energy economy 'sooner rather than later'. Labor market looks fantastic."

We lose more jobs to technology than the average recession per year. China has a net loss of manufacturing jobs due to technology, even as they take in manufacturing jobs from foreign markets. This means that as technology replaces man power, more labor can potentially be done with the same resources. Otherwise, technology would be abandoned for manpower. Because there is a loss of labor to be done as it is replaced by technology, it is necessary for the wealth produced by this technology to be distributed fairly. Labor must have leads in or labor will collapse under technology. Labor collapsing means the general market collapses if the majority of humanity has no income potential. By using free energy, all laborers can be turned into techs, farmers, or capitalists, and free efficient machines can perform all meaningful jobs of labor. This will produce a booming economy forever.

Regarding Billy Bunkie the Science Junkie's term on non-negative numbers, and debt being 'in the red', we must resolve our understanding of what debt is. A negative number is not a 'debt', as nothing can be less than a vacuum, but it is a resolution for this place to be filled by something else becoming zero. This can be a partition of a grouping, such as 'part of my resource' or 'part of my labor'.

Walmart Nouvelle

2007-03-02T09:31:00.000-08:00

Walmart could become a good net-order store. They have the capital to augment their chain[s] with a good warehouse/home delivery service. Sears did it 115 years ago. Any chain could quickly take advantage of the world's internet population and use webcams store chats and net salespeople to sell goods.

I imagine the store as a webhangout as well as a business. Active chat rooms, a forum, news tickers, maybe a DJIA category board for certain genres, you can have your ads, plenty of store and product review blogs, [oh, that did it], map and directions protocols, store locators, warehouse locators, search engine, product finder, charity lists and clickable charities, and maybe some flash games too. Webcomic rings. Modest hosting. It'll be bright.

Next up will be the product order info. People will come here for the funk above, and also find the time to order products amazon style to be delivered same day or at their convenience. Grocery-style. No one waits 2 days for groceries. They get it in hours. So they will get a blender they see on a webcam in hours, in the comfort of their home. You can order a pizza online, why not a blender?

Walmart is making far less money on its old stores. Perhaps they should begin *closing* unprofitable stores, or turn them into internet cafes and direct warehouses.

Greenspan to China?

2007-02-28T14:53:00.000-08:00

I am surprised that Allen Greenspan addressed "China" regarding the recession. Was it a state to state call?

The New Global Economy and Chaos

2007-02-27T06:20:00.000-08:00

There is technology available to shift the global economy and human structure away from the traditional economic structure and its greivances. This encompasses a major change in the structure of society, greater than any in modern history. The greatest challenge is not the acquisition of the technology nor the building of the infrastructure, but how to do this with a minimum level of chaos, destruction, and loss of life.

The primary up-coming resource needing leadership in structural change is free energy. Free energy impacts power plants, transportation, militaries, industry, urban environments, residential attachments and certain natural resources. Holdings in these sectors minus natural resources surpasses $7 trillion. These use or produce almost all of our world's produced energy and release the vast majority of the world's pollutant toxicity.

If free energy were released onto the 'market' today, it would explode like an atom bomb onto our way of life. We need to replace the jobs and infrastructure currently in place with free energy systems.

We could allow this to breach the market, and simply allow competition to progress. All major companies that did not upgrade would become 'uncreditable' from their poor business model. Companies would close ~immediately and ~800 million jobs would be destroyed. This would be grand chaos.

If we can provide massive capital to new industries forming and oversee the expenditure of this capital to appropriate contracting agencies, we can provide a suitable cover-slip to 'profitability'. A sufficiently-sized portion of new technology products and industry will need to be introduced in private sectors [machinery, equipment, contract installations] to support itself and be maintained.

Nationalizing or 'globalizing' public production sources could mediate the level of competition and price to make outdated facilities still produce some revenue to contribute to their dismantling and the construction of new facilities.

The state can also affect this change by switching all of its private and public contracts to new technology sources. This change alone would be enough to found a support structure. and improve government and industry efficiency. Pollution would also be reduced substantially.

Existing contracts for inefficient industries may stay on the books, but the new market would make it less profitable to renew them.

Vast natural resources will need to be updated in market value. Oil, uranium, coal, natural gas, these things will decline in value and usefulness. Industries devoted to cultivating them should be dismantled or abandoned in favor of new industries with high potential for economic interaction.

Automakers will need enhanced competition from these auto companies. A state-run or privately funded automobile manufacturer will need to be assembled. Perhaps in a Canadian factory complex. See examples from www.ustransitauthority.blogspot.com and below on this site to determine certain principles of automotive advance that may be useful and clean. Major automakers may be able to update using their own credit and capital without substantial government or social pressure if they are faced with competition from a small Canadian firm using this technology. The Canadians will not be able to produce millions of cars, but their presence on the market will encourage rapid change. Their assured profit will also assure rapid growth and fantastic credit. This may be a good example for many potential industries, so that the market will 'assist itself' in changing.

[con't.]

Ashoka.org

2007-02-11T00:00:00.000-08:00

Advertising on the Moon

2007-02-05T08:31:00.000-08:00

Advertising is a poor choice. the individual should decide and seek the things they need.

This is complex because of the dynamic macroeconomics. A business should be successful [fit] enough without needing to advertise. Advertisement in a way is a weakness and protectionism. Only large companies can afford to nationally advertise, so small companies are at a distinct disadvantage, causing business hegemony, sloth, and increased franchisement vs entrepreneurship.

This could serve as a centralization of economics, but it also produces greater mass-market risk and may reduce worker recompense and increase cost of living.

Does a house rot entirely before it falls down?

Intensity of advertising also clogs public space and airwaves. It is distinctly not beautiful in its purpose, even if it may have a beautiful person or script as a mask.

What is the alternative to advertisement? A greater product review could assist economic fitness. [We even have a consumer product review?] An economy that relies on being lean and tight instead of enormous and poorly allocated could be a good choice.

We currently cycle the world's resources heavily with the WTO, IMF, -advertisement- and other hegemonic financial systems. For example, until recently, all oil as traded in dollars. As were most bonds. That centralizes resources in America at the cost of personal interest.

Promoting very unfavorable and unbalanced economic conditions is a poor way of infusing cash into a non-functional system propped up by military might or other contracts.

This system is then caught in place by a decapitated electorate and a Congress influenced by titanic fiscal interests, requisite by their own inefficiency.

2007-01-28T01:51:00.000-08:00

Originally there were herders and farmers. It's totally not the herders' fault that the animals they chase ate crops the farmers protected. But it sucks that the herders didn't mind the farmers' loss. They should share beef and herbs.

Furthermore, there is another class of human. The merchant. They care not for farming nor for herds. They have other goods and piles that they trade. These folk have fancied themselves the new rulers of the world over the needs of hunters and farmers. This might be fine if they honor God. Farmers keep varmints away, and herders try to supply the best grass. While a merchant should try to cultivate their products and have them improve their customers.

Merchants, rulers, who do not honor God with their works labor in dishonor.

Receipt for Debt

2007-01-24T14:41:00.000-08:00

This post will discuss two main topics: currency traded for bonds and oil, and international cash reserves.

1. Sources say that this year for the first time substantially more bonds globally were traded in Euros than dollars. Dollars counted less than 40% of all transactions. A major source of these bonds are oil receipts, as well as gross industrial production and foreign trades.

2. China has overtaken Japan as the largest holder of capital. They have about $1 trillion, 700 billion of which is in dollars. They have decided to diversify their holdings away from the dollar.

China was both crediting America's trade deficit and domestic budget deficit and collecting American dollars. This propped up dollar-value internationally, while American fiscal heads ran up very large debts around rolling deficits. We became involved in longstanding and expensive wars and domestic irresponsibility and offshored our industrial base. We also sold our roads.

If China chooses to offload these dollars even over a few years, the American dollar will be housed. America will no longer have the fiscal ability to support itself, nor likely the credit rating to acquire financial support.

Predicting possible scenarios is not a worthwhile endeavor in this kind of fical market. New technology could potentially erase debt and deficits, and is a finer choice than playing small game.

It may be so that America has been planning this fiscal scenario since the PNAC signng. If the American aristocracy planned to run up large deficits before cornering the oil/energy market and then shut down oil flow worldwide except where it chooses, they could attempt to 'get away with' poor fiscal performance followed by very agressive military and economic warfare. God would not allow this to succeed.

This plan would be 'holed' by water-splitting technology or other major scientific advances which have been discovered, patented, and prototyped extensively.

Blessed are the poor, in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. -Beatitudes

A Leaner Industrial Complex

2007-01-20T23:58:00.000-08:00

In the interest of spurring change and competition in the auto industry and world energy market, it may be beneficial to reduce the cost of the industrial complex. Some businesses in a governmental 'shadow', where high overhead and startup cost provide them with global market protection and the ability to crush or buy out all competetors produces an oligopoly of power among the major automakers. This power has been abused as demonstrated in the crushing of mass transit and the electric car, and other anticompetetive business practices and corporate interference with governance and law intended to regulate this industry.

This industry is also pervasive into consumer and public life, and affects us environmentally in the post-combustates of its products on the health of individuals and the planet.

Personal Economics: Some try to see how much money they can earn. We should instead try to see how little money we can earn and still have what we want.

How can we make the cheapest 1000 cars possible?

Marketing and advertising pose some of the largest expenses. Megacompanies spend bull-ions on their stock and on national and international television placement. If the goal is to sell 1000 cars, it will be an easier task to personally locate and sell individuals seeking automobiles, or to provide these autos to rental agencies or other infrstructures in addition to the general market. This can reduce the cost of production substantially and improve the vehicles' value.

Government money could also be appropriated for this purpose from grants. It may also be possible and exciting to gather investors for a small car effort from those interested in supporting or a new direction in energy and automobiles. Investors might be enticed by a novel product in such a large market. The potential for growth is explosive, and the ability to customize is fantastic. However, inviting stock sharing and therefore needing to provide greater return on investment will reduce the value of the vehicles.

Providing this money is a good way to generate capital to produce the cars, but the level needed to be reached should also be lowered, not merely assets raised. Producing parts for vehicles is a major expense and often requires large varied and complex infrastructure. Using a 3D printer to machine the various parts for the vehicle will dramatically reduce the amount of machinery required to shape the parts. This method can also allow more efficient part systems, since they can be built as one piece instead of assembled. This allows wiring to be internal to the device, for example, and necessitates fewer pieces per car.

Special electrolysis can also provide the ability to cheaply run electrical and hydrogen furnaces and other metalshaping and carbon refining methods.

To outsell major autoworks, these cars must be far more attractive and efficient than their modern market counterparts. For example, a 1000-model car will not 'quickly outsell' GM unless its numbers are far more advantageous than major models.

For example, it would be easy using appropriate technology to build a car that gets 50-100mpg and has a '5-star' level crash rating, can carry 4 passengers, and performs admirably. This kind of car would explosively outsell any standard model because the demand for it would be dramatically higher.

Maintenance on the vehicle can be reduced in price by printing and using some standardized parts. One of the major drawbacks of building 1000-model cars is the number of 'unique' parts they could use. It will be difficult to maintain these vehicles and replace the parts if they all use dissimilar parts. This can be avoided by conforming to major automakers.

Major automakers make more money by building cars that require maintenance. They get to sell replacement parts more frequently. As long as the initial model sells and retains some degree of resell value so as not to be totalled and abandoned, more part failure and replacement is more profit for major automakers. This is hideous, but if major automakers' parts can be machined more cheaply using a 3D printer, some of these small businesses may overtake major automakers' maintenance departments. This may inspire automakers to rely less on failure to generate revenue.

1000-model cars can be more specially built so that they will not require substantial maintenance. Automakers used to build cars to be proud of, that would last for 'a long time'. Many vehicles from before 1972 still run, and well, because they were carefully crafted in a time before planned obsolescence.

If these vehicles can be crafted using revenue-increasing and cost-reduction methods, they can probably out-value GM. It may be easier to sell to target markets rather than mid-market. Producing a solid and efficient $10,000 vehicle, and an outstanding $40,000 vehicle will probably be the best-selling choices.

See US Transit Authority for automobile blue-details.

Oil

2006-12-20T00:46:00.000-08:00

Unfortunately, I am forecasting an increase in the price of oil compared to other dollar-value goods. Since the world's oil will no longer be traded exclusively in dollars, we will pay more dollars for oil. This means that oil prices for dollar holders should be rising.

What options does this produce?

2006-12-07T02:08:00.000-08:00

Interest rates being high implies that the return on borrowed money should be high, yes? But in this low-return economy, how can that be so? It this rewarding fortunes, megafinance, and saving? Is it reigning in entrepreneurship and lending/borrowing in a poor economy?

Perhaps the rates *should* be lower.

2006-11-29T12:31:00.000-08:00

[This is a joint operation with www.ustransitauthority.blogspot.com to educate and reduce commutes.]

I looked back on the jobs I have had, and found that one of the factors making a job most enjoyable was a short commute. The quality, workmates, content, and pay scale of the job were also factors, but the commute played a part of many of these, since commuting is technically part of working, unless your commute is zero.

A long commute will actually *reduce* your effective salary. Assuming you produce 40 hours a week on the job for 50 weeks a year, every half hour of your daily commute will add 250 hours to your work. This reduces your hourly wage by 1/8, if you work 2000 hours a year. An hour long commute reduces your salary by 25%.

Furthermore your commute is not free. Assuming that you drive and get good mileage and fuel prices remain stable, you are also paying ~$5 per half hour of your daily commute. This becomes $1250 per year per half hour of your commute. If you are commuting 2 hours to work every day, you have increased your work year from 2000 hours to 3000 hours [taking a 33% pay cut] and you also will pay $5000 in fuel expenses, add maintenance and wear. Is that job worth your time and money? They would have to pay you substantially above-market rates to make it equally worth your while to commute.

You could take a lower paying job closer to home, or move closer to your job, if it is worth the time commuting. Please consider this when choosing employment, transportation, and residence. You will help improve your quality of life and the freetime you have to enjoy it more, and you will help save the planet and help the community.

College Books and Excessive Profit

2006-11-28T12:56:00.000-08:00

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/volusia/orl-collegebooks2506nov25,0,954603.story

College textbooks are the ultimate monopoly market. Often the college bookstore is the only source for the book, which is often 100% required to pass. This can elevate the cost to 'anything not suspicious'.

This is not legitimate. It contains criminal business practices, and at the very least needs to be changed. So here we are at the crossroads.

Anything that is aggressively profitable is, well, unfortunately wrong. If you're making 500% profit on something and it is turning into quite an uneven amount of leftover cash, you are cheating someone. Not maybe cheating, not making a killing, you are doing something wrong.

Unless your customers are not suffering from paying the cost. In that case, it doesn't seem to matter, except for being peculiar. But if you're charging students $400 or $500 per semester for books, and you produce these books for pulp, and could sell them for half their price, and the students are suffering, you are profiting from their suffering, which is bogus.

This practice is anti-community, anti-commerce, and detestable. It should stop.

Dominus Vitae

2006-11-20T12:37:00.000-08:00

People vs Nations

If you own 66% of the world's resources, along with it comes the responsibility of those who rely on those resources for survival. Aggressive economics can be lethal otherwise, which is in the jurisdiction of the law.

This is the basis of state formation. If massive investment groups want to form commerce nations, then they will be allowed to, but they must operate in line with UN charters or they will be acted upon.

In the same way, building a national fence is unethical if you place a plurality of vital resources on one side only. In the way governments claim imminent domain, human populations may be able to claim dominus vitae on resources or other controlling elements.

Oil -> work
Drugs -> God
Sex -> love

Do not let the medium get in the way of the message.

If owning that much stuff gets in the way of your duty to others, you should not have it.

When economics and ecology clash, there will be death. This is potentially one of the laws of economics, or one of the consequences of environment.

Who do we represent? We are God's people, here to represent God.

Do not let the medium get in the way of the message.

Money is Also From God

2006-11-19T01:45:00.000-08:00

Money represents things. It is the earth, a bushel of wheat, a field of oil. Having money is like having an unsubstantiated or undefined deed. It does not give you tyranny over the item. It gives you responsibility and authority over the item.

Money, too, is from God, as is the water and land and your time and life. It is to be used responsibly. Someone who makes a monopoly using money is a criminal just as someone who makes a monopoly using land or other resources.

If the Federal Reserve commits a monetary monpoly, they will deserve antitrust charges in the name of the people.

Black Gold Beans

2006-11-09T18:48:00.000-08:00

Observe this movie about 3rd world - 1st world dominance in trade. If these 3rd world countries had a way to generate energy cheaply, they would not need to trade for such a pittance, and could engineer their economy more 'fruitfully'. This could give the 1st world less beneficial resource deals, though. This is economic terrorism.

Making coffee farming profitable is a good way to get more real trading partners and fewer impoverished slave-nations. The ideal is no impoverished slave-nations, and this is possible with free energy. This cannot condone 1st-3rd slavery. It is a crime that the 1st world enforces. It would be better to pay them reasonable wage for their beans than to break their knees into economic weakness.

Bare Cost of Living and Federal Minimum Wage

2006-11-06T15:31:00.000-08:00

The 1968 minimum wage was equal to $9.33 [2006]. The cost of living in 1968 was also lesser in 2006 dollars. This would make even the least able person capable of making a suitable living wage! We did beat the Soviets' communism in that sense, and tenable welfare and other tax-provided public services can fill the gaps inbetween. But we lost to the lowest bidder when our state became unable to do this by allowing megaprivatization, corporatization, lagging out the minimum wage, and unbalancing the economy that is now threatening our Constituional framework and producing a poor lifestyle for millions in America and exploiting those around the world.

http://www.letjusticeroll.org/stateminimumwagechart.html
This chart shows the state minimum wages. The federal government recently did not pass a law that would make the minimum wage $7.50.

Monthly: hi low
Car insurance 78 78
Gasoline 200 100
Car care 150 50
Rents 500 300
Foods 400 300
Repayments 300 200
Stuff 200 22
Savings 200 50
Tax/Junk-15 305 165
---------------------------------------
M-Total 2334 1265
Annual 28000 15144

Weekly Pre- Tax Income
538 291

Hourly Wage $14.00 $7.57
[2000hrs]

This is a rough estimation of the basic living needs of the average human being working in America. If they begin debt free, they can work easily and use $2400-3600 less per year, which would turn into $1.20-1.80 less per hour, changing the debtless basic plan to $6.37/hour. Car insurance for many states and drivers is higher than $78 per month. Savings selections may vary. Rent indicates shared inexpensive rented dwelling. Food may cost more than $400 per person per month. The Red Cross affords something like $75 weekly for a person for food. Purchase of 'stuff' assumes no 'major' spending events, like buying a leather jacket or new computer, or only every few months. Assume no health insurance, or job-only payers, or add it on top at ~60 biweekly, turning into +~$.75 hourly. The tax is also somewhat low and does not include state tax.

The state minimum wage in:

Massachusetts is $6.75. In January, 2007 it will become $7.50 FAIRish
Connecticut is $7.40. In 2007 it will become $7.65 FAIR
California has $6.75. In 2007 it will become $7.50 In 2008 it will become $8.00. Okay
New Hampshire: Federal Rate $5.15. POOR.
New York State is $6.75. It will become $7.15 in 2007. NOT-OK
Rhode Island is $7.10, which becomes $7.40 in 2007.
Vermont has $7.25, which is adjusted for inflation annually! KIND OF FAIR
Washingont State had $7.63, which is the highest minimum income state, which is adjusted for inflation annually. Only Washington state truly meets the living minimum figured here.

The Cost of Free Energy

2006-10-31T23:47:00.000-08:00

The True Cost of Free Energy

A free energy watercar is extremely probable, due to the massive amount of examination examples have received from the US military, NASA, and by the examination and proliferation of HHO and hydrogen gas water engines, many with nationally registered patents by independent scientists in America, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Europe, the Philipines, and other "100%+" efficiency inventions. For example, in spring 2002, a patent was issued for a motionless electromagnetic generator producing some 100 times the power put into it. Japanese patents for electromagnetic devices and other engines producing 100%+ energy are also 'common'.

These items are not fantasy and do not draw energy from nothing. Examine statements at www.timetravelisforsuckers.blogspot.com for detail on 'zero-point' energy devices. Some draw energy from the universal constant, an ambient energy level that is present everywhere, even in empty vacuums devoid of matter. Some use the entrainment principle of wave synchronization to force vibrational atomics to change chemical structure. This is the most likely explanation for water splitting, and would account for the precise hertz level the electrons must be moving at for the process to work. More inventions and explanations abound at www.byronwine.com.

So many wonder, if these remarkable devices exist, why isn't GM using them? Why isn't the USGOV using them? The answers are the choices of certain key shareholders and officers, but we can speculate their motivations.

Oil experts estimate that there are "100 trillion dollars worth of oil" [$100T] underground right now, with the greatest collection in the hands of Saudi Arabia, followed by Iraq. This is a ridiculously large sum that can drive entire economies, the entire world economy, and change the history of mankind and isolate power at key bottlenecks. If there is an 'oil monopoly', and cars run only [95%+] on oil, then only those who control oil will have substantial automotive power. This plays a massive force in world commerce. More powerful than supply alone, price sets levels of domination, basically a Seringhetti pecking order, and can be used to track money movements and used as currency and payments. For example, the US NAVY was able to track every tanker than left Iraq. >50% of oil smuggled from Iraq during 1991-2003 went to a US company in Texas.

Oil Reserves: $100 Trillion
This does not count coal, uranium, or natural gas, which are also very highly valued.

This also does not include the hundreds of oil refineries found worldwide. Russia has hundreds, America has hundreds, Europe has plenty, the Middle East has hundreds, Asia has probably hundreds of them. A 'refinery' is not a SimCity 16-square sized building. Some of them take up entire SimCity sized maps, encompassing multi-square-kilometer facilities. These facilities could be themselves valued collectively at perhaps $2 trillion dollars.

Oil Refineries: $2 Trillion

Free energy devices, usually producing no immediately meaningful pollution, would also immediately replace all non-free power plant facilities. This means that all nuclear plants, and the world has over 400 operational nuclear reactors, with many plants having up to 4 reactors or more at a plant, with dozens of nations from Uruguay to Malaysia having plants. There are also hundreds of research plants, fuel processing facilities, refining plants, and uranium mines and their industries. China plans to open 2 new plants per year until 2020, according to the 2004 GE symposium. Note that Turkey Point nuclear plant in Florida was hit by Hurricane Andrew and shut down, while Three Mile Island and Chernobyl both had nuclear accidents, and both plants attempted to conceal the news!

A nuclear plant is 1:1.3 efficient, about 23%, and each KW capacity costs around $3200. This would make a 650MW plant cost a hair over 2 billion dollars. The world's collective energy production nuclear power plants probably cost in the vicinity of 800 billion dollars. The average nuclear power plant is not profitable until its 17th year of operation because of energy costs. The majority of nuclear plants are owned by private companies.

Geothermal energy could replace this cost without polluting, and could potentially decrease volcanic and earthquake activity. The majority of earth's caloric heat comes from earth, not from the sun. Geothermal energy is also $~2800/KW capacity, beating nuclear by a fair margin and producing no meaningful pollution.

Add onto this the world's coal plants. According to this site, 54% of American energy comes from coal power. We have 600 coal power plants in America, which produce more radiation from carbon isotopes, than nuclear plants produce in pure radiation, although nuclear waste is highly concentrated, and nuclear plants purposefully release radiation into the environment on a biweekly basis. According to wiki, a 500MW plant costs $650 million, and we have some 600 of them. As of 2004, a coal plant cost $1300/KW capacity. These plants and their background mines and refineries add up to $390 billion. They are all infrastructure, and free energy would turn their value to $0. Assuming that other nations combined have only about equally as many coal plants as America has, plus $20 billion in infrastructure, the total springs to $800 billion.

Alternative energy projects such as wind and solar plants would also likely become illusions. It is more probable, given the assumably probable existance of sufficient alternative energy technology, that wind and solar power are entirely red herrings, and designed to down-market non-oil power sources, and distract those who would search for alternatives with the 'likely competetors'. Yes, solar and wind power suck and cannot meaningfully replace oil or coal or nuclear power at their current production levels and our current demand. They will still be useful for low-draw operations.
World Coal and Nuke power plants: $1.6 Trillion

Then consider our automotive industries and oil companies and their factories and all cars on the road. As of Y2K, 51 of the 100 largest economic entities were corporations, not nations. In 2000 GM had a net worth of $176 billion dollars, ranking #23, just behind the nation of Turkey, and beating out the whole country of Denmark, with a $174 billion economy. Exxon-Mobil was #26 with $163 billion. Ford Motor was #27 also at 163 billion, and Daimler Chrystler was #28 at $160 billion. Poland was #29 at $154 billion. Mitsubishi and Toyota are #38 and #39 with $117 and $116 billion each. Royal Dutch is #43 with $105 billion. Israel is #46 with about $100 billion. BP is #56 at 83 billion, Volkswagen is #58 with 80 billion, and from there it becomes loose change with Honda and Nissan ranking #78 and #80 pulling in ~55 billion each. Also on this list are Boeing, Deutsche Bank, State Farm Insurance, Bangladesh, Fiat -#85, 51 billion, Toshiba, Siemens, and Mexico, which has an economy about as large as America's annual debt of $~500B. America's GDP in 2000 was ~8.7 trillion dollars. Today it is something like $13 trillion, but in American dollars, which is about equal to 8.7 trillion USD2000.

These figures are for the year 2000. Since then these companies have all grown at a rate of perhaps 4% per year, while the average salary has risen 0.3% per year for the past 25 years -NPR interview. Inflation defeats this salary increase. Cost of living has also increased. The collected major oil company annual sales on this list were $350 billion dollars. Numerous smaller companies, such as Venezuela's state oil company, and other traders, were not on this list, and presumably would bring the total oil revenue to ~450 billion dollars, when oil cost about a buck a gallon. Remember gasoline cheaper than bottled water? The total number of car sales in the year 2000 for the major companies listed comes to $973 billion, with total world car sales probably leveling out at $1.1 trillion dollars, that year. The world spent $1.095 trillion on armies and weapons and wars in 2005, I believe. In the years since 2000, with these companies growing at 4% per year would place their total revenue for 2006 at around $1.9 T in 2005-6.

All oil companies and their affiliated gasoline stations would become $0 value in the event of water energy. All automotive companies would need to scrap the majority, let's call it 85%, of their factories and lineup processes. All carburaters and fuel injection systems would need to be retooled, all exhaust systems rendered worthless, and likely new fuel cell and other technology items spliced in their place. Please note that these companies often have subcontractors whom are not listed in their revenue tree.

Actually, it is likely that only about 85% of automotive company sales and efforts would be destroyed per year, until it becomes fiscally impossible to continue production. This would take about 1-2 years. A market for replacement parts could continue for 10-20 years.

Also note that all oil traded in the world comes in Dollars, not Euros, not Yen, not Yuan. This conversion process is very lucrative for Americans and dollar traders everywhere. One of the major concerns of Saddam Hussein's regime was that he wanted to trade in Euros for the first time in 2003, shortly before we invaded him. Other media recently [October 2006] says that he had issued statements that he would cooperate fully with American forces shortly before our invasion, but that George Bush refused to acknowledge these statements.
Automotive and Oil sales: $1.9 Trillion

All passenger and cargo and other jets would need to be refitted, again at 85% of fleets or more per year. Fortunately, we are approaching the era of hypersonic scramjets, which run on hydrogen fuel anyway. Most alternative combustion fuel production methods would just make this process easier. However, the aerospace industry is a multi-billion dollar economy, and Boeing was listed in 2000 asa #74 with $58 billion. It's major competetors, Airbus, and other world companies, and passenger jet companies, would face major losses to the measure of billions-touching-trillions. The American military receives nearly $500 billion annually and has hundreds of petroleum fuelled jets. NASA's rockets and all our ~500 football field sized ICBMs, other missiles, military hardware vehicles, and a majority of our nation's warships are also fuelled with petroleum products. Some of our warships are nuclear powered. They would face special challenges that might make replacing 85% of them or more annually difficult to agree with. I am not counting military expenses apart from the annual budget, only geopolitical tactical considerations.

Aerospace Industry and Jets: ~$2 trillion + military

This brings the grand total of loss of capital and expense for the introduction of alternative fuels to ~$107.5 trillion dollars, not counting accumulated coal, natural gas, and uranium resources. Also on this bill are the 1st world's supremecy, as no one anywhere in the world would ever want for electricity ever again, which could easily produce virtual economic autonomy everywhere. In the event of such economic exuberance, the American Federal Reserve would lose all control over the value of the dollar and all world currencies, companies would no longer be able to maintain their obsoleted patents, factories and industrial magnates would no longer be able to maintain natural monopolies from costs of production, since the cost of production would decrease so rapidly and far from "removing" the energy market basically in its entirety, any person with such a machine and a modest amount of capital could start any production facility they chose.

The value of the commodities that capital could buy would also be deflated preposterously because of the corresponding industrial explosion from eliminating the majority of the cost of energy-intensive production efforts. Heavy industrial efforts, such as producing carbon fiber, would become cheaper than producing steel. Automotive and generating engines using the new technologies would become as expensive as the cost of their natural resources, plus tooling, plus profit of 8-10%, and still cost a fraction of what they do today, in 2006, in terms of manhours of labor and dollars. Natural resource harvesting, of plentiful metals, minerals, lumber, hemp, crops, could all be accomplished using non-polluting, free-to-run-continuously-and-for-years engines that themselves would eventually be made using robots.

Robotics could easily flood the market with any level of goods of any type within years. Maintenance of automated industrial production would become the major time and labor consuming cost of indsutrial production. Entrepreneurship and competition would become pure in almost every field because of the reduction of business expenses and cost of living.

The political and economic upheaval of the process would almost certainly bankrupt Duke Energy, the IMF and World Bank, most automotive production companies who do not embrace the shift, most financial institutions who do not embrace massive currency chaos, deflation and adjustment, and likely some major retailers unless they shift tactics. Any company that stands in the way of this shift will be brushed aside eventually either by the grinding halt of peak oil, or by the amazing tide of free water energy. You have until ~2010 at the very latest.

The Kyoto Treaty will be meaningless, no company will be able to produce a sufficient amount of CO2 to pollute the world substantially. Major polluters will be put out of business by more efficient and cleaner technologies. These new technologies will probably allow us to easily research new ways to clean up wastes and toxins and new medical procedures to treat diseases. Unfortunately, and depending on the level of chaos, returning to this level of infrastructural articulation will probably take 5-10 years after these shifts, which will themselves probably take 5-10 years, beginning as soon as water technology breaks out industrially, or as soon as we invade Iran or another oil entity, or ~2008 when peak oil will otherwise arrive.

This will cost us $107.5 trillion imaginary dollars, which represent potential labor, which will be replaced by an economic and social utopia. Your strength will be meaningless in this economy. Only your skill will be worth rewarding. A dollar will not produce an ear of corn that no one tended to. An existing machine could shovel a ditch for zero net units of energy. You can only trade a dollar for labor. Natural resources all belong to the ground. The ground and we, who came from dust, belong to God.

><>

Corporations and The Individual

2006-10-31T20:36:00.000-08:00

What is good for corporations is good for their investors and CEO/board. Reaganomics did not work, and the money did not 'trickle down'.

Examine the increase in class seperation opening in the 1980's. That is where the money went. Not to the lower or middle class.

The same can be said of corporations, except their pockets are infinitely deep for withholding sums in finance. You could just lower the interest rate on loans a % or two instead.

We've seen corporations get huge deals and tax breaks in the past 6 years. It has widened this gap moreso than any time since the 1920's, and perhaps even to the 1890's, before we used AntiTrust laws on those railroad robber barons and mega-industrialists.

We have also been using an agressive privatization version of capitalism that strips public welfare. Welfare like schools and hospitals, quality of living, cost of living, and median wage. All of these sectors have taken a beating.

Thanks For The App

2006-10-31T12:56:00.000-08:00

"What if New York had its own currency? In a sense, it already does. Our dollar looks the same as the better-known U.S. version, but it doesn’t go nearly as far here as anywhere else. How much is it really worth? Based on a few scientifically imprecise calculations, a New York dollar would lag somewhere behind a Canadian buck. Here’s why:"

Thanks. Examine this article in relation to regional economics.

Finance and Labor

2006-10-31T11:29:00.000-08:00

I am disappointed with republican and statewide attempts to eliminate medical coverage and pensions for seniors. These things are not only general duties of the state, but they have been sworn to when they took the money from them for insurance and FICA etc in the first place.

If the state removes that compensation, they will need to replace it with some other meaningful support. Perhaps excellent research into proteinology or stem cells, and support to hospitals and medical organizations and provision of statewide healthcare. Installing these procedures can save 16-20% right off the top, which would normally be profit for investors who can likely afford their own healthcare.

In American capitalism that becomes private profit. In European and Canadian capitalism, those services are not private sector, they are provided by the state, and no 'profit' is made. Healthcare costs for all are abated, and taxes rise a few percent to pay for it. Currently [2004-5], healthcare costs the average American family something to the tune of $13,000 annually before work related compensation, which often takes it down to ~$8,500.

Is saving $13K worth even a 10% higher tax rate? Only if you make under $130K.

Furthermore, we have been shoveling much of this medical expense towards pill companies, who openly bribe doctors into prescribing their pills. If we spent money and grants on corrective medicine instead of throwing pills at it, we could do a better job of solving the problem at the root. Research a pill or process to change the way your body makes that chemical reactor, instead of supplementing the chemical reactor.

Companies making huge money on the IMF, oil funds and infrastructure, "big economy", big government, finance, and other fiascos will wreck this country and world within 3-5 years if nothing changes. The Federal Reserve has predicted a 60% likely chance of a major currency crisis in the next 3-5 years. Allen Greenspan has predicted a 70% chance of an American economic crisis in the next 3 years.

I wonder what that 30-40% chance of being saved is? We seem to have the technology to fix these problems, and we have more liquid capital than at most points in history, and the public is more aware than ever, except perhaps the late 1960's, early 1970's. We could change in time, even with disasters in the pipeline, and improve the world for all.

===

Another matter, in an environment where oil is not cheaply producable, human labor will probably become less valuable, as it is supported and extended by oil power. We may all face a pay cut in the form of oil and commodity prices increasing rapidly. The solution here is not to scramble to acquire and supply resources, that will only increase global resource pressure and use more resources in the process.

The solution is to work leaner, not grander. We can do more with less, particularly in corporate environments at the top and in profit margin, in cost to consumers of certain services, and in infrastructure. New technology should be examined in energy, industry, medicine, and transportation which will allow us to be more effective with less material and expense.

Environment and Economy

2006-10-30T14:50:00.000-08:00

I had come up with the environmental economic macroassociation on about October 28, 2006, but more pressing matters kept me from writing until now. I see economist.com has an October 30 spread on the topic.

They project about a 2/5 increase in greenhouse gas emissions by 2025. I wonder, where will these gasses come from? Oil cannot be sustained to those measures. Coal cannot replace oil to that extent, and nuclear power relies heavily on oil power.

If we do not do something about oil yesterday [in 1995] we will face the decline of industrialized civilization. So it may be an open secret that we're heading for a major economic crisis in about 2007-2008-2009, to be preceeded and overlapped by an eventually global military upswing, if it is achievable politically.

This will also be considerable because the value of fiscal currency will likely become far more attached to commodity than its floating value. Regional value of commodities may become exaggeratedly more prevalent than the normal value of a currency. I would expect a rapid shift from liquid assets to commodity and perhaps real estate during this time, especially during war, multiplied by worldwide oil shortage.

What is my fiscal recommendation for such a situation. Leave your 401(k) and put it into something more solid. The stock market is going to be a massive sinkhole in the event of peak oil or a fiscal crisis, or any serious crisis, for which many are we headed. I would avoid the finance sector, as it is fluff and based on nothing. Precious metals and energy shares seem most viable for the old-world economy.

But a new world market will be born, or "no flesh will survive". Energy technology will advance dramatically and allow clean free energy to be produced anywhere for a low cost per kilowatt capacity. This will allow people to live in very low cost of living environments and likely deflate the economies of the most industrialized areas by ~75%. The resource-heavy reasons people went to war will become obsolete, and new society will be formed around the new mankind-sustaining technology. This should square up in the years of the crisis and after.

Brazil will not be making 700 billion tons of greenhouse gasses by 2025. They will be making about 32 billion tons, primarily from exhalation. If you extrapolate growth figures from 2000-2005 without considering advanced technology or resource shortage then you'll get exactly what you chart for, which will not happen.

I am also surprised that the economist is so politically minded, yet they describe long term economic statements without regard to volitility, peak oil, and the effects of environmentally mandated or publicly mandated industrial or political course-change.

5 Year American Economic Forecast

2006-10-18T01:11:00.000-07:00

Is the environment sustainable? I am more concerned that natural resources or other means will run out before the economy 'runs out'. Sustainable is on a 5 year+ or longer term. Is our American economy sustainable on a 5 year term?

*Oil*, *debt*, and *instability* are the three main courses of this fiscal dinner. We're scheduled to hit peak oil still somewhere in 2008, it seems. Or the moment Iran is invaded, or in the event of a serious event somewhere in the oil-world.

Conversely, alternative fuels' breaking of the numerous 'natural' monopolies of the Western superstructure will cost what is estimated to be 'hundreds of trillions' of dollars in expenses and modernizations which are the solitary alternative to oil. We can begin switching to alternative fuels now and stretch out the estimates over the next ~3 years, or we can wait until peak oil and some level of q-100 to q-1000[+] years' crisis that will blank our entire economy and be on the level of the collapse of Rome.

Oil is a worldwide problem. We can handle that as a world. It is far more important than choosing a form of capitalism, which is not a blank check, and this change will dramatically affect the structure of the economy in the next 5 years.

Debt is a serious problem, and along with debt I will group social class fiscal differentiation. Alan Greenspan has placed a figure of 70% at a major fiscal crisis in the next 3 years. Coming into 2.5 years. The Federal Reserve has said a 60% risk of a major American currency crisis in the next 3-5 years. They make the currency.

Social differentiation has also become increasingly profound, and its effects on the *large* American economy have been ravaging. I liken it to termites. This has also been aided at the top by massive outsourcing and shifting industries to foreign countries. This benefits probably 100 people at the top very much, in that they get to rake $ off of Americans and 1st worlders while paying almost none to 3rd worlders.

This makes the elite business owners 1st class citizens, the average American a 2nd class citizen being stolen from [literally] and undersupplied, and the 3rd worlders are still on the bottom. How long can this last? It is and will continue to damage the whole American economy, and the world economy is also being affected.

This contributes greatly to instability, and reduces American ability to produce a high quality of life. When quality of life *reduces* especially, voters become unhappy, and commerce has a tendency to become slightly downcast or saccharine.

...saccharine. That is a good word to describe this administration and recent economic forte.

It is also a profound measure of the success and quality of an empire/country. The breaking of our rights is also a very negative element that is not without fiscal consequences, although political and social and structural consequences are far greater.

So will America last 5 years, economically? The Fed gives that a 40% chance. Alen Greenspan gives it 3 years and 30%. Greenspan being the less interested party, I would use his figure. I would put the official tally at substantially less than 50% chance of moving through the next 5 years in better than 'fair' economic shape.

My personal analysis: we'll get housed by oil in time for the 2008 elections, engineered or no. That can be investigated later. There will be some truth to the problem of oil arriving at that time. But it may also play handily into someone's hands. *Do not* trust them. This will not be a time for trusting men with large plans unless they accord with God's plan very closely.

We may face this debt crisis when American credit runs out. I am not sure when that will be, but China and the world that disapproves of our military moves could choose to simply 'not finance' the war in Iran. In which case American credit would plummet, and American interest rates would shoot up, and we'd dry out. Considering that our plan is to roll over our bonds, we might come to an economic grinding halt if we are unable to meet our debt, and need to take teen% bonds. I don't think a possibly decade-terminal oil crisis is the time for a bond market. That power thing needs to be addressed first. More on that and the total tally soon.

3-5 years. Destabilization, too. Will we find ourselves in another Constitutional crisis when we impeach George W Bush? Will he commit our troops in Iran before we can get him out? Will the 2006 midterms bring this business on in time for 2007? What will China do in this situation? What would happen if the American people recaptured the American media, which is likely post midterms, which is likely in the year before the 2008 elections? We've got this North American Union thing that is seriously unpleasant. We're facing serious threats to our 1st 4th and 8th amendments, we're still at war with 'no nation', oh, and there's the 9/11 scandal. It's now a scandal, and not a conspiracy. When the scandal becomes trials that may be the official boiling point of political capital. Also that will be the latest possible point at which George W Bush will be impeached and tried, along with however many of the others who aided him. This will occur before the end of his term.

Those are the facts! Please pray to God for us.

American vs European Capitalism

2006-10-17T14:16:00.000-07:00

We can easily measure this in certain ways. Unfortunately, the American style of stark capitalism has shifted dramatically to the right in recent years, providing 2 models, one established, one new circa 1999.

2006 capitalism has produced dramatically differentiated classes of income, and raised the cost of living bar considerably. At the same time, support for public services of all kinds, including healthcare and education, have been scaled back, sometimes by as much as 25% in one spending year. Profits for corporations and the wealthy have skyrocketed, but employment levels are far down and the average salary is far down and even farther considering inflation of currency and increase in cost of living. This is definately a downward swoop for about 75% of the population, and the general support services for all but the very rich and their elite core are also down in general.

European capitalism has slowed primarily as a result of their steady business cycle and as side effects of American and Asian fluxuation and fuel competition. Their technology is advancing rapidly and at a more evenly supported and installed pace than American technology.

It may also be noted that American corporations and ruling natural monopolies have been suppressing technology that could revolutionize materialism and the social economy as a whole.

For this reason, decency, I must prefer European capitalism over American, although Eurocap is by no means perfection.

Natural Monopolies and Alternative Energy

2006-10-16T14:19:00.000-07:00

Why does the government create monopoly power via its patent system, when elsewhere it spends millions trying to prevent the emergence of or regulate monopoly power?

The state wants to foster scientific growth. Although, this may be at odds when a scientific advancement would threaten the basis of a natural monopoly. For example, www.byronwine.com shows that GM, oil producers, and other companies have worked to suppress carburater technologies and alternative fuel technologies. Rudolpf Diesel, inventor of the diesel engine, when he tried to switch back to vegetable oil from crude was killed, likely by industry competetors. His fuel plan would have substantially reduced the natural monopoly of refineries. Today, alternative fuel technologies could/would demolish the accrued arbitrary wealth stored up in those refineries, oil fields, and also in certain elements of the $billions-level auto industry, as well as shift massive oil-centered political power, and the energy production industry and all it subsidiaries, nuclear and coal plants, natural gas plants, commodities shifting systems and infrastructure, and potentially their power lines and permits and contracts, certain elements of jet propulsion and tactical military complex production and threat assessment, as well as certain chemical plants, steel mills, and other cottage industries that would be quickly replaced by a new technology that made superior procedures affordable. As well as the added competition that could potentially be faced in most any monopolistic business by drastically reduced startup costs due to this shift in power production and availability of superior systems. Modernizing itself would probably cost 10-20% of any major firm’s annual revenue, while obsoleting many industries and fundamentally altering many others. However, the cost of this upgrade would be dramatically reduced by the very same measures that caused the need to upgrade. Furthermore, the 10-year return on value of investment and quality of life would be phenomenal. However, an investment in this era and a reutrn in that era would be very difficult to compare due to the corresponding shift in the value and function of money in such a society. This might/would cause massive deflation, which could seem like devaluation to an analyst or investor, but in actuality it is hypervaluation because of the new perfusion of goods and the cheapness of producing and distributing those goods in the new market.

Alternative fuels still face an uphill battle, but they are being aided by Mother Nature, the principle of shortage, and growing human population. All these are God’s ways. Patents do exist for alternative technologies. About 20 patents exist for 100%< efficient special electrolysis water splitting technologies and certain companies make use of them. A patent for a motionless electromagnetic generator was produced in spring of 2002, but it has yet to be meaningfully applied for these reasons.

Capitalism vs Consumerism

2006-10-12T21:58:00.000-07:00

Capitalism is pretty harsh, and involves few who are excessively wealthy who make the seemingly real decisions, to provide oten scripted choices for consumers.

In today's world of technology, we experience a considerable level of corporate and economic abuse from capitalism, most of it precipitated upon the outside world away from America and the 1st world by our corporate elites. If Africans had this corporate networking using them as a home base or an 'elite base' to paraphrase George W Bush, they would be rich, well educated, have cities with substantially less crime and full of infrastructure, have their diseases rooted out, etc.

We should focus on a kind of makret consumerism or commercialism overlaid with a level of economic democracy. It is not right that people who inherited all the money [world's resources] make decisions that are undemocratic, and unrepresentative of the needs and wants of the average person or directly honoring God.

I believe that a properly and freely educated public will be able to vote and pay effectively on issues. Capitalism brings us 3rd world debt and Enron, brings us a government owned and deadlocked. We must either enact anti-trust laws and freedom of science laws in this age of environmental and social precipice, we should not allow ubercapitalists to ruin the world and keep us from the ethical utopia we dream of.

2006-10-12T21:52:00.000-07:00

Also this marketing to a Muslim religious niche is an offense in itself. Stop. Do you market to Christians?

Frankly, what WOULD Jesus buy? Probably basic needs and then anything else for charity to others.

Internet Mercantilism

2006-10-12T21:24:00.000-07:00

Myspace has recently said that it may block Youtube.

This is why capitalism does not work well.

Myspace, if you block youtube, i will block *you*. What do you think this is? Tariffs of the mercantilist era? Myspace, you cannot possibly hope to make more money by blocking internet traffic. You cannot possibly expect to maintain a business or software edge by reducing your usability. Believe me, you will be swallowed like something someone didn't even know they ate.

This is also why internet neutrality is more critical than Myspace's business. If I'm blocked from youtube by my service provider, not only will I refuse to pay them for services not rendered, but I will search for a server that does provide this service flatly. Myspace, for threatening to degrade the internet, your stability has been threatened. Recant.

Consideration

2006-10-12T20:28:00.000-07:00

I just recently blogged on this topic. It is actually my October 6, 2006 posting on this very page.

Please employ me as a professional analyst. I would accept the job of living somewhere in Virginia and examining these documents 40 hours a week plus projects for a reasonable salary and some level of immunity.

Let us also celebrate that China has unblocked wikipedia and has decided to not censor it. I have been praying about this. I am quite pleased with this activity and I will pray that it continues.

Now, businesses around America and the globe can likely save approximately 2/5 to 3/5 of Microsoft's annual revenue by switching to an open source OS and potentially open source office works. How much do our businesses spend on this annually? $45 billion? I read somewhere that it would require some $2K-$3K per user to upgrade to Vista. This probably accounts for a few extra sticks of RAM per device as well. Many businesses won't make this switch, and those that do, do not need to.

It would be cheaper for some large businesses to pay their tech sector or commission a free project to build Linux 2, designed to be widely-open compatible and user-structurable, if somewhat skeletonized. Linux 2 could also be pluggable like Mozilla, a framework of supporting code with suitable plugability for running programs that would be User Interface [UI], accessability and translatability, and device communication. I want it to be able to manually decipher USB communications, produce probable meanings based on HD-stored or server hubbed network databases, and for users to be able to customize the functionality of their joystick or printer's buttons in the way they communicate with the CPU.

You know, or whatever works for under 2-3K/head at your institution. Call the Nuremberg Valley of Germany. I bet they can help you. If America doesn't go open source next, let Europe do it and crush all. Bulgaria is already on the train!

Oh, about advertising dollars, Microsoft will need to join them or fight them, and fighting them will not be easy or legal. the real fulcrum rests with business' intelligence. While these stocks may not exist in their perfection, an officelike open source shell that does not rely on the internet is around the corner. When businesses look for a way to spend less on their software, they will find and make open source.

While pay-software will always exist, it is unlikely that it will be a requirement to pay for one drop of software. unless you like video games, which is something like a $30 billion world industry...

3D Printing and Internet

2006-10-09T02:13:00.000-07:00

This is indeed what the internet could be like someday.

http://www.greedtube.com/video/28/web_20_thefirstpostcouk

I wouldn't design 3d printers to do this precisely, but printing out a cooked pizza slice and pulling magazines from a screen that also prints objects is a fantastic way to make the world be.

A 3D printer uses nanorobots to construct molecules atom by atom and objects molecule by molecule. A flat LCD-style screen could become a drafting board for printing that object out of the screen itself, or out of a relatively flat panel somewhere else. Documents could also be printed vertically instead of horizontally.

This and its compatriots by 2015. Or bust. Quite frankly, or bust.

Youtube and Money

2006-10-07T23:46:00.000-07:00

Why have I heard so much about youtube being bought? I am not interested in allowing youtube to become a massive corporately owned nothing-box. Youtube owner, I saw you on some magazine. Keep your company. Does it not make you money? Do you not already have millions in assets? Diversify your stock portfolio, keep over half of your company if you are able to, and set aside a few mil in something realistic for if youtube suddenly bombs or something unimaginable.

That is my ownership-business strategy for you. You have made a fine product and your service belongs to the people of the world and of the internet, who choose to post videos online to share with others. Thank you for helping us! Please continue to. We will thankfully surf to your website and generate whatever income you manage to get from the site. That's the deal. We like it. Do not cut it.

2006-10-06T17:18:00.000-07:00

I want to ask you, what would happen if this internet non-freedom was put into place, with your phone company giving you slower connection to websites owned by companies that compete with them?

Would phone companies even be able to field the complaints from all their existing customers? How many customers do you think would complain? 60-80%? More? how many would leave for a different company? 20-30%. Can you [company] lose 1/3 of your customers to your own greed?

The internet is a flat rate call. The 1st amendment is a clear and straightforward document and the law you must obey.

We need a classical reinterpretation of the 1st amendment, and the 4th for that matter. And regarding torture, the 8th. This should do our country very well. I believe electioneering reform, media freedom, "$/voice" is within the 1st, NSA and wiretapping and secret prisons and detainment are within the 4th, and torture is within the 8th. Note that all men are created equal and therefore we have to obey the interpretation that all humans on earth and all intelligent living beings are 'created equal' and have these rights.

Think about this the next time you consider devoting money to

Tech Sector

2006-10-06T11:21:00.000-07:00

This is particularly about Microsoft. I've heard of their difficulties in the modern era, and I realize them. Their products are pretty *sluggish*.

Computing is like the world of economy F1 racing. If you don't make the fastest and best carputer for the cheapest, you will not win. Microsoft's products have become 'bourgeois'. Fluffy. Full of crap. Slowish in the CPU. Microsoft, is this true? If it's not true, show me.

IE is universally worthless. You can legally take many tips from mozilla and other such neat little engines. You could make a suitable technically customizable civilian browser. I have no interest in using your inbred emailing system. DON'T give me a button to do it on. I will just tear it off.

I am looking for a plain cheese pizza browser, ORGANIC, with no crap on it, leaving as much breathing space as possible for the CPU. Then I will browse from the condiments and whatever stuff I have brought with me to decorate it, obviously subject to examination. = how the consumer world works. Expect to make money around or through that system.

You can't make billions selling a giant hulking piece of junk and also have the will of the people. Right now you are struggling to have either. Why does Vista require 750Mb of RAM? That one always tripped me up, and because of the unpleasantly large cache size, I will not ever purchase Vista, and I will warn others of its foulty. If you hope to make $ off of Vista like 95, 98, or XP, you will be sadly mistaken, unless you trick a large number of executives into putting it on all their PC's, which is shameful and rowdy, and will harm the marketplace.

We work hard to slim our older [2003] computers down. Even the new ones get geeky [cool]. Vista is not in that world. Folks want to play Doom3 and have it run quickly, not by purchasing a billion megs of ram and a 4 gig clock and then running Doom3 through Vista, which is like running Doom3 through another instance of Doom3, but by having a reasonable amount of computer power and using it efficiently. Microsoft, your OS XP skips out on a dozen or more speed tweaks that have 0 reason to be off. Is this an offense? Shall we begin to investigate your fiscal and ethical earnestness? Seriously. Get on the stick. I am sure Vista could easily use half as much RAM as current and fix all the untweaked bits from XP.

You could probably make a good deal of money by typing out a small little versatile browser program, and kicking it out online. You'd make money because the program would cost like $10-20,000 to make. How to make money off this, though. Mozilla is free. How do they make money? Ads? Hey, how DO they make money? Are they non-profit? They probably do use ads. Mircosoft, you're a major company. You already have a large software and customer base. You can make more money from ads than from software, if you try. I wouldn't give you the true cred to make a tech zine site with any draw, but how long would it take your team, no, 1/8 of your team, to blast off a single well done browser that is contemporarily spy-free and will run on 30MB of ram? A day? Single digit project. "Inescapable usefulness." is the term that I want Microsoft to use. "Inescapable spaghetti."

I also really dig XPLite, even if it's not yours. I am considering it seriously. Maybe you should too. Once you've recouped your expenses on Vista... well, even beforehand, start slimming it down. Even at the sacrifice of some less useful features. Offer those things as downloadable extras, 'plug-ins'. My OS doesn't need to shave my poodle. It needs to open, have a visual display of my junk, and run my crap. Do it quick, do not leave corners. Do not ever crash, optimize the BIOS for me if you could with a single buttonclick, and run anything I say to. That is all. No lights, no gadgets, no guages. Do not automatically include WMP, QT, whatever. I can get those from the internet. They also slow it down, so I'm a shopper. Maybe sell Vista with those things as clickable extras, and cut the core size of Vista down today to ~550MB? I know you can. And if you work it will be 350 and 250 before you know it. That is 'within range'. TinyVista? Hey, what does Vista do that XP doesn't? I still haven't seen/paid attention to any of that. I say this seriously to you like an editor.

So... if you want to sell a giant Christmas tree without the spirit, go ahead, but know that it's a neon distraction and not a meaningful standby. Give the spirit.

Tech Sector

2006-10-06T10:49:00.000-07:00

This is particularly about Microsoft. I've heard of their difficulties in the modern era, and I realize them. They are disliked for numerous reasons. One of the most important ones is their business practices. They face monopoly charges and fines from the EU... [but not from America?]. Their products are pretty *sluggish*.

*Computing is like the world of economy F1 racing. If you don't make the fastest and best carputer for the cheapest, you will not win. Microsoft's products have become 'bourgeois'. Fluffy. Full of crap. Slowish in the CPU. Microsoft, is this true? If it's not true, show me.

Enough browbeating. I'm here to help you. Your IE is universally worthless. It is weak because of its numerous exploits. We do not enjoy having to keep 85 updates on our computers, even from security center. This makes our computers slow and exposes them over and over to faults. No automatic updating system can make this right.

You can legally take many tips from mozilla and other such neat little engines. You could probably make a totally suitable civilian browser which would punch out viruses by not having a slot to be punched by them. I have no interest in using your inbred emailing system in my browser. DON'T give me a button to do it on. I will just tear it off.

I am looking for a plain cheese pizza browser, ORGANIC, with no crap on it, going as fast as possible. Then I will browse from the condiments and whatever stuff I have brought with me to decorate it. Those things too are obviously subject to examination. = how the consumer world works. Expect to make money around or through that system.

You can't make billions selling a giant hulking piece of junk and also have the will of the people. Right now you are struggling to have either. Why does Vista require 750Mb of RAM? That one always tripped me up, and because of that tripping and the unpleasantly large cache size, I will not ever purchase Vista, and I will shame it continually. If you hope to make $ of of Vista like 95, 98, or XP, you will be sadly mistaken, unless you trick a large number of executives into putting it on all their PC's. Which is shameful and rowdy, and will harm the marketplace.

We work hard to slim our older computers down. Even the new ones get geeky. Vista is not in that world. Folks want to play Doom3 and have it run quickly, not by purchasing a billion megs of ram and a 4 gig clock, but by having a reasonable amount of computer power and using it efficiently. Microsoft, your OS skips out on a dozen or more speed tweaks that have 0 reason to be off. Is this an offense? Shall we begin to investigate your fiscal and ethical earnestness? Seriously. Get on the stick.

You could probably make a good deal of money by typing out a small little versatile browser program, and kicking it out online. How to make money off this, though. Mozilla is free. How do they make money? Ads? Hey, how DO they make money? Are they non-profit? They probably do use ads. Mircosoft, you're a major company. You already have a large software base. You can make more money from ads than from software probably, if you try. I wouldn't give you the true cred to make a tech zine site with any draw, but how long would it take your team, no, 1/8 of your team, to blast off a single well done browser that is spy-free and will run on 30MB of ram? A day? Digit.

I also really dig XPLite. I am considering it seriously. Maybe you should too. Once you've recouped your expenses on Vista... well, even beforehand, start slimming it down. Even at the sacrifice of some less useful features. Offer those things as download extras. My OS doesn't need to shave my poodle. It needs to open, have a visual display of my junk, and run my crap. Do it quick, do not leave corners. Do not ever crash, optimize the BIOS for me if you could with a buttonclick, and run anything I say to. That is all. No lights, no gadgets, no guages. They slow it down. If you want to sell a giant Christmas tree without the spirit, go ahead, but know that it's a neon distraction and not a meaningful standby. Give the spirit.

2006-09-27T17:55:00.000-07:00

Building a crappy product or making an inefficient system is throwing away labor and its results.

Vehicle Tax and Shift

2006-09-26T22:36:00.000-07:00

Inefficient vehicles should be taxed specially and that money go to funding research and development of new fuel vehicles and electric and water splitting vehicles. Or promiting these kinds of vehicles. This kind of legislature and corporate action would very rapidly shift our automotive industry and abilities to moderate our own corporations.

"Tax and Shift" would be a great program. We should keep this one on the books as one of the greatest and most immediate ways to shift from the economy and world we experience to the one that we would wish to live in.

Inspired by music heard at www.radioleft.com.

Material

2006-09-25T13:56:00.000-07:00

"The main theme was the same: the efficiency of the justice. It's interesting to fully understand what a cosmic universal economic system is. They explain it as follows: an economic plan, aimed at efficiently satisfying man's needs so that he is released from the tyranny of material things over his daily life."

This can be accomplished in the manner previously described, using 3d nanorobotics for industrial production, Tesla field circuitry for power transmission, and water splitting, motionless electromagnetic generators for power. Raw materials can be harvested and waste can be removed and processed in similar ways made efficient in terms of machinery and manpower by proper engineering. Maintenance should be performed as infrequently as possible by design of products.

The remaining time, which will become a majority of time, can be spent on love, refining social elements, information and communication, kultur, religious study, and building sandcastles.

"In other words, if everyone has everything at his disposal, then the acquisition of material goods is no longer of paramount importance. This can only be achieved by providing "equal shares for everyone"; otherwise envy will always exist. The culture then becomes more or less stable."